Brooks Julianne D, de Medeiros Rafaella Cazé, Sun Shuo, Sankaranarayanan Madhav, Westover M Brandon, Schwamm Lee H, Newhouse Joseph P, Haneuse Sebastien, Moura Lidia M V R
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Epilepsia. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1111/epi.18594.
We examined choice of outpatient epilepsy-specific antiseizure medication (ESM) after a stroke discharge and outcomes in a sample of US older adults.
In this matched cohort study, we analyzed a 20% sample of US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) between 2009 and 2021 who were discharged home. Individuals met insurance coverage criteria and were not taking ESM before hospitalization. We matched individuals on days from discharge to ESM initiation. Individuals who initiated ESMs other than levetiracetam within 30 days of discharge (n = 229) were matched to levetiracetam initiators (n = 687). We did not include antiseizure medications used for treatment of pain or psychiatric disorders such as gabapentin and benzodiazepines. We investigated the time to seizurelike events, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions using a semicompeting risk framework.
The matched cohort of 916 ESM initiators had a median age of 73 years (interquartile range = 69-81) and was 57% female and 71% non-Hispanic White. Using the semicompeting risk framework, those who received other ESM had a 37% lower hazard of seizurelike events compared to those receiving levetiracetam, given that death had not occurred (hazard ratio = .63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .43-.91). Among other ESM initiators, the hazard of ED visits and hospital readmissions, given that death had not occurred, did not differ significantly from initiating levetiracetam (hazard ratios = 1.00 [95% CI = .80-1.25] and .98 [95% CI = .75-1.28], respectively).
In a sample of US Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS and discharged home, initiating levetiracetam in the outpatient setting was associated with a higher risk of seizurelike events compared to other ESMs. However, there remains a possibility of residual confounding by indication, as individuals with greater risk of seizures may have been started on levetiracetam. We did not observe significant differences in the risk of ED visits or readmissions, suggesting comparable safety profiles in broader clinical outcomes.
我们研究了美国老年成年人样本中卒中出院后门诊癫痫特异性抗癫痫药物(ESM)的选择及其预后情况。
在这项匹配队列研究中,我们分析了2009年至2021年间因急性缺血性卒中(AIS)住院并出院回家的65岁及以上美国医疗保险受益人的20%样本。个体符合保险覆盖标准且住院前未服用ESM。我们根据出院至开始使用ESM的天数对个体进行匹配。在出院30天内开始使用除左乙拉西坦以外的其他ESM的个体(n = 229)与开始使用左乙拉西坦的个体(n = 687)进行匹配。我们不包括用于治疗疼痛或精神疾病的抗癫痫药物,如加巴喷丁和苯二氮䓬类药物。我们使用半竞争风险框架研究癫痫样事件、急诊就诊和再入院的时间。
916名开始使用ESM的匹配队列的中位年龄为73岁(四分位间距 = 69 - 81),女性占57%,非西班牙裔白人占71%。使用半竞争风险框架,在未发生死亡的情况下,接受其他ESM的个体发生癫痫样事件的风险比接受左乙拉西坦的个体低37%(风险比 = 0.63,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.43 - 0.91)。在其他开始使用ESM的个体中,在未发生死亡的情况下,急诊就诊和住院再入院的风险与开始使用左乙拉西坦的个体相比无显著差异(风险比分别为1.00[95%CI = 0.80 - 1.25]和0.98[95%CI = 0.75 -