Sousa Vitória Alice Alencar, Ferreira Daniele Nunes da Silva, Mendonça Giovana Vitória Guimarães, Marinho Rebecca Lobato, Andrade Natasha Cristina Oliveira, Soares Tamires de Nazaré, Silva Marcos Jessé Abrahão, Lobato Diana da Costa, Dos Santos Suziane do Socorro, Rodrigues Yan Corrêa, Sardinha Daniele Melo, Lima Luana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde (SESAU), Benevides, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Parasitária na Amazônia, Universidade do Estado do Pará and Instituto Evandro Chagas (PPGBPA/UEPA/IEC), Belém, Brazil.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 23;12:1605584. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605584. eCollection 2025.
Medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) pose a serious public health challenge, particularly in intensive care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. This retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize the profile and identify risk and protective factors for MDRPIs among adult ICU patients in a metropolitan region of the Amazon between January 2021 and December 2022. We reviewed 603 medical records-31 patients (5.1%) developed MDRPIs and 572 did not-and applied chi-square tests, normality assessments, Mann-Whitney U-tests, binary logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Fundação Hospital de Clínicas Gaspar Viana Ethics Committee (approval no. 5,991,542). Independent risk factors for MDRPIs included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 19.33; 95% CI 2.92-127.73; = 0.002), orotracheal tube use (OR 19.00; p = 0.002), nasal catheter use (OR 3.33; 95% CI 1.32-8.40; = 0.011), and longer hospital stay (OR 1.09 per day; 95% CI 1.05-1.12; < 0.001). Protective factors were systemic arterial hypertension (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.08-0.58; = 0.009), higher Braden scale scores (OR 0.22 per point; 95% CI 0.08-0.58; = 0.002), and invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.79; = 0.025). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with MDRPIs had significantly longer hospital stays and higher mortality rates (Breslow = 0.007; log-rank = 0.041; Tarone-Ware = 0.011). This first study of MDRPIs in the Amazon region highlights key modifiable factors and underscores the need for enhanced nursing protocols and working conditions to prevent device-related pressure injuries in critical care. These findings can guide continuing education initiatives and policy development in critical care nursing.
与医疗设备相关的压力性损伤(MDRPI)构成了严峻的公共卫生挑战,尤其是在新冠疫情期间的重症监护环境中。这项回顾性队列研究旨在描述巴西亚马逊地区一个大城市成年重症监护病房(ICU)患者中MDRPI的特征,并确定其风险因素和保护因素。研究时间为2021年1月至2022年12月。我们查阅了603份病历,其中31名患者(5.1%)发生了MDRPI,572名患者未发生。我们进行了卡方检验、正态性评估、曼-惠特尼U检验、二元逻辑回归和Kaplan-Meier生存分析。本研究获得了加斯帕尔·维亚纳临床医院伦理委员会的伦理批准(批准号:5,991,542)。MDRPI的独立风险因素包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(OR=19.33;95%CI:2.92-127.73;P=0.002)、使用口气管插管(OR=19.00;P=0.002)、使用鼻导管(OR=3.33;95%CI:1.32-8.40;P=0.011)以及住院时间延长(OR=1.09/天;95%CI:1.05-1.12;P<0.001)。保护因素包括系统性动脉高血压(OR=0.22;95%CI:0.08-0.58;P=0.009)、更高的Braden量表评分(OR=0.22/分;95%CI:0.08-0.58;P=0.002)以及有创动脉血压监测(OR=0.14;95%CI:0.03-0.79;P=0.025)。生存分析表明,发生MDRPI的患者住院时间显著延长,死亡率更高(Breslow检验:P=0.007;对数秩检验:P=0.041;Tarone-Ware检验:P=0.011)。这项在亚马逊地区首次开展的关于MDRPI的研究突出了关键的可改变因素,并强调需要加强护理方案及改善工作条件,以预防重症监护中与设备相关的压力性损伤。这些研究结果可为重症护理的继续教育计划和政策制定提供指导。