肺磨玻璃影患者抗血栓治疗期间同步经皮活检与微波消融的强化管理策略:基于我们经验的临床视角

Enhanced management strategy of synchronous percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation in patients with lung ground-glass opacities undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a clinical perspective on our experience.

作者信息

Wang Nan, Chen Guoqiang, Jin Bingjie, Lu Wenjing, Xu Jie, Xu Jingwen, Xue Guoliang, Ye Xin

机构信息

Department of First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Lung Cancer Institute, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 23;15:1554365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1554365. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study was conducted to delineate our experience in managing perioperative antithrombotic agents in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy underwent percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation (B+MWA) for lung ground-glass opacities (GGOs).

METHODS

The study comprised 67 patients with GGOs who receiving antithrombotic therapy underwent B+MWA sessions from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. During the perioperative period, patients who received rivaroxaban as a bridging drug were assigned to Group A, and who interrupted the antithrombotic therapy were assigned to Group B. Information about the technical success rate, positive biopsy rate, local control rates, and major bleeding and thrombotic complications were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Group A comprised 36 patients (19 males; mean age, 67.97 ± 8.49 years), while Group B comprised 31 patients (12 males; mean age, 65.48 ± 4.32 years). The technical success rate was 100%. The positive biopsy rates were 94.44% and 96.77%, respectively. In group A and B, the overall local control rates at 6, 18, and 24 months were 100.0% vs. 100.0%, 94.44% (34/36) vs. 96.77% (30/31), and 86.11% (31/36) vs. 87.10% (27/31), with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.2156). During the perioperative period, a single case of lower extremity venous thrombosis was identified in Group A, while three cases of lower extremity venous thrombosis, one case of new-onset cerebral infarction, and one case of new-onset pulmonary embolism were identified in Group B, with no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with direct interruption of antithrombotic therapy, the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period of B+MWA in patients with GGOs who are receiving antithrombotic therapy can reduce the incidence of severe thrombotic complications without increasing the risk of bleeding, with a satisfactory effectiveness.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在阐述我们在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中管理围手术期抗血栓药物的经验,这些患者因肺磨玻璃影(GGO)接受经皮活检和微波消融(B + MWA)。

方法

该研究纳入了67例接受抗血栓治疗且在2020年1月1日至2022年5月31日期间接受B + MWA治疗的GGO患者。在围手术期,接受利伐沙班作为桥接药物的患者被分配到A组,中断抗血栓治疗的患者被分配到B组。收集并分析有关技术成功率、活检阳性率、局部控制率以及主要出血和血栓形成并发症的信息。

结果

A组包括36例患者(19例男性;平均年龄67.97±8.49岁),而B组包括31例患者(12例男性;平均年龄65.48±4.32岁)。技术成功率为100%。活检阳性率分别为94.44%和96.77%。在A组和B组中,6个月、18个月和24个月时的总体局部控制率分别为100.0%对100.0%,94.44%(34/36)对96.77%(30/31),以及86.11%(31/36)对87.10%(27/31),两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.2156)。在围手术期,A组发现1例下肢静脉血栓形成,而B组发现3例下肢静脉血栓形成、1例新发脑梗死和1例新发肺栓塞,两组之间出血和血栓形成并发症的总体发生率无统计学显著差异。

结论

与直接中断抗血栓治疗相比,在接受抗血栓治疗的GGO患者B + MWA围手术期使用利伐沙班可降低严重血栓形成并发症的发生率,且不增加出血风险,有效性令人满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f5d/12327042/3beedfab3b75/fonc-15-1554365-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索