文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

采用基于个体的方法优化林奇综合征携带者的降低风险手术和阿司匹林决策辅助工具:一项出声思考访谈研究。

Optimizing risk-reducing surgery and aspirin decision aids for Lynch syndrome carriers using the person-based approach: A think-aloud interview study.

作者信息

Kohut Kelly, Morton Kate, Turner Lesley, Foster Rebecca, Bancroft Elizabeth K, Burn John, Crosbie Emma J, Dominguez-Valentin Mev, Esplen Mary Jane, Hanson Helen, Hurley Karen, Moller Pål, Ryan Neil, Snape Katie, Eccles Diana, Foster Claire

机构信息

Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

South West Thames Centre for Genomics, Clinical Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70089. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70089.


DOI:10.1002/jgc4.70089
PMID:40772451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12329710/
Abstract

Lynch syndrome "carriers" carry a germline pathogenic variant conferring gene-, sex-, and organ-specific increased cancer risks. They are presented with difficult, interrelated choices over their lifetime. This study was part of a larger project to codesign a health intervention, Lynch Choices™ https://canchoose.org.uk to provide an information hub and decision support for carriers, their family members, and clinicians. This study aimed to answer the research question: What content, framing, and design elements of a decision aid for genetic cancer risk management are important to Lynch syndrome carriers? Adult carriers were invited to a think-aloud interview to hear their thoughts about a prototype version of Lynch Choices™ containing values-clarification exercises. The first half of interviews focused on the gynecological risk-reducing surgery and the second half on the aspirin decision aid. Twenty carriers (eight men) were interviewed, half of whom had a personal history of cancer. Iterative refinement of Lynch Choices™ content and design was completed between interviews using a transparent table of changes from the person-based approach. Following the interviews, reflexive thematic analysis was applied to the entire qualitative dataset. Three themes were constructed to guide further optimization and make recommendations for improved cancer risk communication in clinical practice. The three themes were: (1) Interpreting gene-specific cancer risks and "What does it mean to me?"; (2) Words matter: Careful phrasing is important to feel understood; (3) Decision aids: They can help but might trigger emotions. Think-aloud interviews provided in-depth insight into the psychosocial context of carriers. This informed optimization of the decision aid to support engagement and promote shared decision making with healthcare professionals. The learning from this study had broader implications beyond decision aid development, to understanding preferences, needs, and experiences regarding genetic cancer risk communication and decision support.

摘要

林奇综合征“携带者”携带种系致病性变异,会增加特定基因、性别和器官的癌症风险。他们在一生中面临着艰难且相互关联的选择。本研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目共同设计了一项健康干预措施——林奇选择™(https://canchoose.org.uk),为携带者、其家庭成员和临床医生提供信息中心和决策支持。本研究旨在回答以下研究问题:对于林奇综合征携带者而言,遗传癌症风险管理决策辅助工具的哪些内容、框架和设计元素至关重要?成年携带者被邀请参加出声思维访谈,以听取他们对包含价值观澄清练习的林奇选择™原型版本的看法。访谈的前半部分聚焦于妇科降低风险手术,后半部分聚焦于阿司匹林决策辅助工具。共有20名携带者(8名男性)接受了访谈,其中一半有个人癌症病史。在访谈期间,使用基于人的方法的透明变更表对林奇选择™的内容和设计进行了迭代优化。访谈结束后,对整个定性数据集进行了反思性主题分析。构建了三个主题,以指导进一步优化,并为临床实践中改善癌症风险沟通提出建议。这三个主题分别是:(1)解读特定基因的癌症风险以及“这对我意味着什么?”;(2)措辞很重要:谨慎措辞对于让人感到被理解很重要;(3)决策辅助工具:它们可能会有所帮助,但也可能引发情绪。出声思维访谈深入洞察了携带者的心理社会背景。这为决策辅助工具的优化提供了依据,以支持参与并促进与医疗保健专业人员的共同决策。本研究的经验教训不仅对决策辅助工具的开发具有更广泛的意义,还有助于理解关于遗传癌症风险沟通和决策支持的偏好、需求和经历。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bd0/12329710/b0608b887f64/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bd0/12329710/b0608b887f64/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bd0/12329710/b0608b887f64/JGC4-34-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Optimizing risk-reducing surgery and aspirin decision aids for Lynch syndrome carriers using the person-based approach: A think-aloud interview study.

J Genet Couns. 2025-8

[2]
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-1-1

[3]
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.

Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28

[4]
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.

Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28

[5]
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-4

[6]
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-9-25

[7]
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2025-7-23

[8]
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.

Inquiry. 2023

[9]
Views of people who have given birth on the environmental and occupational exposure risks of nitrous oxide for labour analgesia: an interview-based qualitative study.

Anaesthesia. 2025-7-29

[10]
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-1-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
The English National Lynch Syndrome transformation project: an NHS Genomic Medicine Service Alliance (GMSA) programme.

BMJ Oncol. 2023-10-30

[2]
'I Live With Lynch. Cancer Worry Ebbs Into the Background, Then Something Brings It to the Fore.' A Qualitative Interview Study Exploring How Lynch Syndrome Carriers Make Sense of Their Cancer Risks and Implications to Support Decision Making.

Psychooncology. 2024-9

[3]
A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International.

Health Promot Int. 2024-6-1

[4]
Information needs of Lynch syndrome and BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers considering risk-reducing gynecological surgery: a qualitative study of the decision-making process.

Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2024-5-2

[5]
Introducing the revised framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: A challenge and a resource for nursing research.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2024-6

[6]
Codesign of Lynch Choices : Using implementation science to create a clinically deliverable patient decision support website to transform cancer genetics care pathways.

Psychooncology. 2024-3

[7]
New Approach to Equitable Intervention Planning to Improve Engagement and Outcomes in a Digital Health Program: Simulation Study.

JMIR Diabetes. 2024-3-15

[8]
Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in : A review of published research and introduction to the (RTARG).

Palliat Med. 2024-6

[9]
Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the Ready.

Health Expect. 2024-4

[10]
Effectiveness of evidence-based decision aids for women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants in the german health care context: results from a randomized controlled trial.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023-10-16

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索