Suppr超能文献

在先前接受抗VEGF药物治疗(有/无负荷期)的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中,转换为法西单抗治疗后1年结局的比较。

Comparison of 1-year outcomes after switching to faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration previously treated with anti-VEGF agents with/without a loading phase.

作者信息

Hikichi Taiichi, Kurabe Haruka, Notoya Amane, Oguro Yuuna, Hirano Misaki, Doi Yumeka

机构信息

Hikichi Eye Clinic, Kita-7 Nishi-5 7-1 Kita-Sky-Building, 14 Floor, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0807, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01258-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the 1-year outcomes after switching to faricimab with/without a loading phase of three monthly injections followed by a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration previously treated with anti-VEGF agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case study.

METHODS

Eyes with persistent exudative changes despite injection intervals of 10 weeks or less were switched to faricimab between June 2022 and December 2023 and included in this study. All eyes switched to faricimab between June 2022 and June 2023 received a single injection followed by a treat and extend (TAE) regimen (group 1). Thereafter, all eyes switched to faricimab received three consecutive monthly injections followed by a TAE regimen (group 2).

RESULTS

Of 153 eyes switched to faricimab, 21 eyes (17 in group 1, four in group 2) were excluded because of discontinuation of faricimab due to persistent exudative changes despite bimonthly injections; 132 eyes of 132 patients were analyzed. Faricimab treatment significantly improved the best-corrected visual acuity, anatomic parameters, with extended injection interval 1 year after the switch in 132 eyes and 45 eyes of group 2. That improvement, except the injection interval in 87 eyes of group 1, did not reach significance. The injection interval in group 2 was extended significantly compared with group 1 (P=0.023).

CONCLUSION

Switching to faricimab with a loading phase followed by a TAE regimen may improve outcomes in previously treated eyes. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

比较在先前接受抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物治疗的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者眼中,在有或没有三个月一次注射的负荷期后改用法西单抗并采用治疗并延长(TAE)方案的1年结局。

研究设计

回顾性连续病例研究。

方法

尽管注射间隔为10周或更短,但仍有持续性渗出性改变的眼睛在2022年6月至2023年12月期间改用法西单抗,并纳入本研究。2022年6月至2023年6月期间所有改用法西单抗的眼睛均接受单次注射,随后采用治疗并延长(TAE)方案(第1组)。此后,所有改用法西单抗的眼睛均接受连续三个月的注射,随后采用TAE方案(第2组)。

结果

在153只改用法西单抗的眼睛中,21只眼睛(第1组17只,第2组4只)因尽管每两个月注射一次,但仍因持续性渗出性改变而停用法西单抗而被排除;对132例患者的132只眼睛进行了分析。法西单抗治疗显著改善了最佳矫正视力、解剖学参数,在改用后1年,第2组的132只眼睛和45只眼睛的注射间隔延长。除第1组87只眼睛的注射间隔外,这种改善没有达到显著水平。第2组的注射间隔与第1组相比显著延长(P=0.023)。

结论

在负荷期后改用法西单抗并采用TAE方案可能会改善先前治疗过的眼睛的结局。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验