Su Bingbing, Zhu Piaopiao, Chen Chaolei, Su Zhanhao, Shen Tiemei
Department of Nursing, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Aug 6;29(10):100648. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100648.
Cross-sectional evidence has implicated a high prevalence of frailty in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS); however, the longitudinal association remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the longitudinal association between the physical frailty phenotype and the incidence of AS in middle-aged and older adults.
Prospective cohort and longitudinal study SETTING: A population-based study of middle-aged and older adults.
This study included participants from the UK biobank study.
Physical frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria frailty phenotype in the UK biobank in more than half a million participants. The primary outcome was incident degenerative AS, and the secondary outcome was AS-related events, that is, AS-related intervention or death due to AS. Cox proportional hazards models and competing risk models were used to evaluate their associations.
Among 480,967 participants (median age, 58.0 years; 54.6% female), 5,589 AS cases and 2,336 AS-related events were documented during a median follow-up of 14.3 years. Compared with robust participants, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) in prefrail and frail participants was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.22-1.38) and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.50-1.84) for incident AS and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19-1.43) and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.30-1.81) for AS-related events, respectively. The results were similar in a series of sensitivity analyses. Compared with robust participants with low genetic risk, frail participants with high genetic risk had the highest risk of AS (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 2.15-3.06). Progression from robust to frail (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.17-4.98) was associated with increased AS risk, while recovery from prefrail/frail to robust (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69) was associated with decreased AS risk.
Physical prefrailty and frailty were associated with incident AS and subsequent AS-related events. These findings highlight the importance of integrating frailty assessment into the primary prevention of AS to better identify high-risk individuals.
横断面证据表明主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中衰弱的患病率很高;然而,纵向关联尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨身体衰弱表型与中老年人群AS发病率之间的纵向关联。
前瞻性队列研究和纵向研究
一项基于人群的中老年人群研究。
本研究纳入了英国生物银行研究的参与者。
在英国生物银行中,超过50万参与者使用Fried衰弱标准表型评估身体衰弱情况。主要结局是新发退行性AS,次要结局是AS相关事件,即AS相关干预或因AS导致的死亡。使用Cox比例风险模型和竞争风险模型评估它们之间的关联。
在480,967名参与者(年龄中位数为58.0岁;女性占54.6%)中,在中位随访14.3年期间记录了5,589例AS病例和2,336例AS相关事件。与健康参与者相比,衰弱前期和衰弱参与者新发AS的校正风险比(HR)分别为1.30(95%CI,1.22-1.38)和1.66(95%CI,1.50-1.84),AS相关事件的HR分别为1.31(95%CI,1.19-1.43)和1.54(95%CI,1.30-1.81)。一系列敏感性分析结果相似。与遗传风险低的健康参与者相比,遗传风险高的衰弱参与者患AS的风险最高(HR,2.56;95%CI,2.15-3.06)。从健康进展为衰弱(HR,2.41;95%CI,1.17-4.98)与AS风险增加相关,而从衰弱前期/衰弱恢复为健康(HR,0.35;95%CI,0.18-0.69)与AS风险降低相关。
身体衰弱前期和衰弱与新发AS及随后的AS相关事件有关。这些发现凸显了将衰弱评估纳入AS一级预防以更好地识别高危个体的重要性。