• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Funding the future: safeguarding pediatric health equity through CMS and CHIP.为未来提供资金:通过医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)及儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)保障儿童健康公平性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;13:1611720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1611720. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
Inequities in the continuum of maternal care in Mexico: trends before and after COVID-19.墨西哥孕产妇护理连续过程中的不平等现象:新冠疫情前后的趋势
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 17;24(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02470-x.
4
Bridging the United States population diversity gaps in clinical research: roadmap to precision health and reducing health disparities.弥合美国临床研究中的人口多样性差距:精准健康与减少健康差距的路线图。
Per Med. 2025 May 13:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2504329.
5
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
6
Research Priorities in Pediatric Asthma Morbidity: Addressing the Impacts of Systemic Racism on Children with Asthma in the United States. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.儿科哮喘发病率研究重点:解决美国哮喘儿童所面临的系统性种族主义问题。美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1349-1364. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-767ST.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Use and Access Associated With Loss of Medicaid Supplemental Insurance Eligibility Above the Federal Poverty Level.医疗保健使用和获得方面的种族和族裔差异与超过联邦贫困水平的医疗补助补充保险资格丧失有关。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):534-543. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0512.
8
Evaluation of Telehealth Services that are Clinically Appropriate for Reimbursement in the US Medicaid Population: Mixed Methods Study.美国医疗补助人群中具有临床报销适宜性的远程医疗服务评估:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 28;26:e46412. doi: 10.2196/46412.
9
Social Determinants of Health and US Health Care Expenditures by Insurer.社会决定因素与美国不同保险机构的医疗保健支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440467. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40467.
10
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of the implementation of doula care to address racial health equity in six state Medicaid programs.研究方案:一项混合方法研究,旨在探讨导乐服务在六个州医疗补助计划中实施情况,以解决种族健康公平问题。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 8;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01185-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital-Based Pediatric Quality Improvement Interventions and Health Disparities: A Scoping Review of the Literature.基于医院的儿科质量改进干预措施与健康差异:文献的范围综述。
Pediatrics. 2024 May 1;153(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-061176.
2
Changing high-risk asthma in Memphis through partnership: Results from the CHAMP program.通过合作改变孟菲斯的高危哮喘:CHAMP项目的成果
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Apr;132(4):485-490.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
3
Role of Community Health Workers in Promoting Health Equity in Pediatrics.社区卫生工作者在促进儿科健康公平方面的作用。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):199-200. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
The Effect of Neighborhood Disorganization on Care Engagement Among Children With Chronic Conditions Living in a Large Urban City.大城市中居住的患有慢性病的儿童,邻里组织混乱对其治疗参与的影响。
Fam Community Health. 2023;46(2):112-122. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000356.
5
Assessing the impact of a statewide effort to improve breastfeeding rates: A RE-AIM evaluation of CHAMPS in Mississippi.评估全州范围内提高母乳喂养率的努力的影响:密西西比州 CHAMPS 的 RE-AIM 评估。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Jul;18(3):e13370. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13370. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Mississippi CHAMPS: Decreasing Racial Inequities in Breastfeeding.密西西比 CHAMPS:减少母乳喂养中的种族不平等。
Pediatrics. 2022 Feb 1;149(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-030502.
7
In Pursuit of Health Equity in Pediatrics.追求儿科领域的健康公平。
J Pediatr X. 2020 Winter;5. doi: 10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100045. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Health Costs And Financing: Challenges And Strategies For A New Administration.卫生费用与筹资:新政府面临的挑战与策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):235-242. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01560. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
Deploying Community Health Workers to Support Medically and Socially At-Risk Patients in a Pediatric Primary Care Population.部署社区卫生工作者以支持儿科初级保健人群中面临医疗和社会风险的患者。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Nov-Dec;20(8):1213-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Telemedicine and Outpatient Subspecialty Visits Among Pediatric Medicaid Beneficiaries.儿科医疗补助受益人的远程医疗和门诊亚专科就诊。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Jul;20(5):642-651. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

为未来提供资金:通过医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)及儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)保障儿童健康公平性。

Funding the future: safeguarding pediatric health equity through CMS and CHIP.

作者信息

Myers Carlie N, Rao Meera, Bandi Rishiraj, Densley Sebastian, Diaz Daniella, Knecht Michelle, Sacca Lea

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;13:1611720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1611720. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1611720
PMID:40777645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12328410/
Abstract

Pediatric health disparities remain widespread among marginalized populations, driven by structural racism, poverty, and unequal access to care. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have advanced equity in pediatric healthcare, ongoing threats to federal funding jeopardize this progress. This commentary examines five articles, including four CMS-funded interventions that address pediatric health inequities by targeting key social determinants of health (SDoH), including access to care, neighborhood conditions, and insurance coverage. Interventions reviewed include Functional Family Therapy (FFT) for adjudicated youth, a hospital-led asthma management initiative in Ohio, community-based care engagement strategies in disorganized Chicago neighborhoods, and a national policy analysis of CHIP's effectiveness. Across these studies, common themes emerged: community engagement, cross-sector collaboration, and expanded insurance access improved outcomes and reduced costs. Medicaid expansion reduced in-hospital mortality and improved access to rehabilitative care, while CHIP increased preventive service use among near-poor children. However, persistent barriers-including racial and geographic inequities-continue to limit care engagement. While pediatric healthcare research has moved beyond disparity detection, implementation of targeted, evidence-based interventions remains limited. Without sustained investment in CMS and CHIP, the infrastructure supporting equitable pediatric care may erode, exacerbating health gaps for the most vulnerable. Policymakers must prioritize funding and support for initiatives that integrate medical, social, and structural solutions to pediatric health disparities. Strengthening CMS-supported programs is essential not only for improving child health outcomes but also for reducing long-term healthcare costs and advancing pediatric health equity.

摘要

儿科健康差异在边缘化人群中仍然普遍存在,其原因是结构性种族主义、贫困以及获得医疗服务的机会不平等。虽然医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)以及儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)在促进儿科医疗保健公平方面取得了进展,但联邦资金面临的持续威胁危及这一进展。本评论审视了五篇文章,其中包括四项由CMS资助的干预措施,这些措施通过针对关键的健康社会决定因素(SDoH)来解决儿科健康不平等问题,这些因素包括获得医疗服务的机会、社区环境和保险覆盖范围。所审查的干预措施包括针对被判定有罪青少年的功能家庭疗法(FFT)、俄亥俄州一项由医院主导的哮喘管理倡议、芝加哥混乱社区基于社区的护理参与策略以及对CHIP有效性的全国政策分析。在这些研究中,出现了一些共同主题:社区参与、跨部门合作以及扩大保险覆盖范围改善了结果并降低了成本。医疗补助扩大计划降低了住院死亡率并改善了康复护理的可及性,而CHIP增加了接近贫困儿童的预防性服务使用。然而,持续存在的障碍——包括种族和地理不平等——继续限制护理参与。虽然儿科医疗保健研究已经超越了差异检测,但有针对性的循证干预措施的实施仍然有限。如果不对CMS和CHIP进行持续投资,支持公平儿科护理的基础设施可能会受到侵蚀,加剧最弱势群体的健康差距。政策制定者必须优先为整合医疗、社会和结构性解决方案以解决儿科健康差异的倡议提供资金和支持。加强CMS支持的项目不仅对于改善儿童健康结果至关重要,而且对于降低长期医疗成本和推进儿科健康公平也至关重要。