Shi Xunwei, Cui Ling, Shi Yu, Zhang Guonan, Yang Zhirong, Wang Dengfeng
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Sep;24(3):283-291. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i3.32.
The study aimed to compare the fast-track and traditional gynaecological oncological surgeries from postoperative recovery.
A total of 107 patients undergoing gynaecological oncological surgery were randomly assigned to the FTS group (n=50) and the traditional group (n=57).
No significant differences in LOS (Length of hospitalization post-operation) were observed. A less total cost of hospitalization and a lower C-Reactive protein (CRP) level were found (P < 0.05). Also, the trial revealed a significantly lower number of the overall complications in the FTS Group (P < 0.05).
FTS applied in gynaecological oncological surgeries is beneficial to patients in terms of the postoperative recovery.
本研究旨在从术后恢复方面比较快速康复和传统妇科肿瘤手术。
总共107例行妇科肿瘤手术的患者被随机分为快速康复组(n = 50)和传统组(n = 57)。
术后住院时间(LOS)未观察到显著差异。发现住院总费用较低且C反应蛋白(CRP)水平较低(P < 0.05)。此外,试验显示快速康复组的总体并发症数量显著更低(P < 0.05)。
快速康复应用于妇科肿瘤手术在术后恢复方面对患者有益。