Ghasemzadeh Ali, Wendt Eric T, Dolan Brendan, Craig Juliana, Allen Glenn O, Abel E Jason, Shapiro Daniel D
Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States.
Division of Urology, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States.
Front Urol. 2023 Dec 8;3:1324696. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1324696. eCollection 2023.
To describe the treatment and outcomes of patients who are medically immunosuppressed due to prior organ transplantation or autoimmune disease with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (cT1).
An institutional database of patients treated for RCC was queried for patients with cT1 RCC and on chronic medical immunosuppression at the time of RCC diagnosis. The outcomes for patients undergoing (1) surgery, (2) ablation, or 3) active surveillance (AS) are described.
Between 2010 and 2022, 74 medically immunosuppressed patients with RCC were identified and treated using surgery ( = 29), ablation ( = 33), or AS ( = 12). Seven (58%) AS patients underwent deferred treatment (six ablations and one nephrectomy) due to tumor growth. For surgery patients and ablation patients, the 30-day readmission rates [17% and 9%, respectively ( = 0.7)], and 90-day complication rates [24% and 21%, respectively ( = 0.9)] were similar. One (3%) surgical patient and two (6%) ablation patients recurred locally. Despite being immunosuppressed, only one (3%) surgical patient, one (3%) ablation patient, and no AS patients progressed to metastatic disease. No significant differences were noted for the local recurrence-free rates, metastasis-free rates, and overall survival for the three cohorts ( > 0.05 for all).
Patients with stage one RCC with medical immunosuppression can be safely managed through surgery, thermal ablation, or active surveillance, with similar outcomes to historical series of non-immunosuppressed patients. Future prospective studies should investigate shared decision making in this patient cohort and include discussion of less aggressive options that minimize morbidity but preserve oncologic control.
描述因既往器官移植或自身免疫性疾病而接受医学免疫抑制治疗且患有临床T1期肾细胞癌(cT1)患者的治疗方法及预后情况。
在一个接受肾细胞癌治疗的患者机构数据库中,查询确诊为cT1期肾细胞癌且在确诊时接受慢性医学免疫抑制治疗的患者。描述接受(1)手术、(2)消融或(3)主动监测(AS)患者的预后情况。
2010年至2022年期间,共识别出74例接受医学免疫抑制治疗的肾细胞癌患者,并采用手术(n = 29)、消融(n = 33)或AS(n = 12)进行治疗。7例(58%)接受AS治疗的患者因肿瘤生长而接受了延期治疗(6例消融和1例肾切除术)。手术患者和消融患者的30天再入院率分别为17%和9%(P = 0.7),90天并发症发生率分别为24%和21%(P = 0.9),两者相似。1例(3%)手术患者和2例(6%)消融患者出现局部复发。尽管处于免疫抑制状态,但只有1例(3%)手术患者、1例(3%)消融患者进展为转移性疾病,而接受AS治疗的患者无进展至转移性疾病者。三组患者的局部无复发生存率、无转移生存率和总生存率无显著差异(所有P均>0.05)。
患有一期肾细胞癌且接受医学免疫抑制治疗的患者可通过手术、热消融或主动监测进行安全管理,其预后与非免疫抑制患者的历史系列相似。未来的前瞻性研究应调查该患者群体中的共同决策,并讨论采用侵袭性较小的方案,以尽量减少发病率同时保持肿瘤学控制。