Mostovych Alexander L, Patel Lexina R, Garg Kartik, Carr Quinton L, Peake Mitchell, Cantrell Ryan, Wilhelmi Bradon J
University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, New York.
Eplasty. 2025 Jul 17;25:e28. eCollection 2025.
Surgical reconstruction of complex wounds requires considerable planning to ensure optimal patient outcomes. A conservative approach utilizing the lower tiers of the reconstructive ladder is preferred, especially in patients with comorbidities lending to a higher risk of poor wound healing. A simplified, low-risk solution with a double-opposing purse-string suture (PSS) and horizontal continuous closure technique may be particularly helpful in reducing the need for more complex techniques of wound reconstruction in select patient populations.
A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent reconstruction with the double-opposing PSS technique (N = 57) by the senior author (B.J.W.) at the University of Louisville between 2019 and 2022.
A total of 46 patients and 57 wounds underwent the double-opposing PSS and horizontal continuous closure technique as directed by the algorithm. The average defect size before and after was 61 and 12 cm, respectively. A 2-tailed paired test analysis was performed to explore the relationship between the pre- and post-closure defect size ( = .0003, (44) = 3.9, 95% CI). A total of 21 wounds required a skin graft, meaning 63% of the wounds were successfully closed without the use of skin graft as a result of the double-opposing PSS technique. In addition, of those 21 wounds, the skin grafts, as well as the donor site sizes, were smaller.
This approach to wound closure demonstrates usefulness in reducing the size of or need for skin grafts in complex wound patients, particularly in those with comorbidities. The majority of patients underwent successful closure of their complex defects in various areas (eg, face, extremities) with this technique. Residual defects requiring skin graft allowed for a smaller graft and, thereby, donor site. Ultimately, this technique reduces the risk of complex complications by simplifying and reducing wound size.
复杂伤口的手术重建需要精心规划,以确保患者获得最佳治疗效果。采用重建阶梯较低层级的保守方法更为可取,尤其是对于那些因合并症而伤口愈合不良风险较高的患者。一种采用双对抗荷包缝合(PSS)和水平连续缝合技术的简化、低风险解决方案,可能对特定患者群体减少更复杂的伤口重建技术需求特别有帮助。
对2019年至2022年期间路易斯维尔大学资深作者(B.J.W.)采用双对抗PSS技术进行重建的所有患者(N = 57)进行回顾性病历审查。
共有46例患者和57处伤口按照算法采用了双对抗PSS和水平连续缝合技术。术前和术后平均缺损大小分别为61厘米和12厘米。进行双尾配对t检验分析,以探讨闭合前后缺损大小之间的关系(P = .0003,t(44) = 3.9,95%置信区间)。共有21处伤口需要植皮,这意味着由于双对抗PSS技术,63%的伤口在未使用植皮的情况下成功闭合。此外,在这21处伤口中,植皮以及供皮区面积都更小。
这种伤口闭合方法在减少复杂伤口患者的植皮大小或需求方面显示出有效性,特别是对于那些患有合并症的患者。大多数患者通过该技术成功闭合了不同部位(如面部、四肢)的复杂缺损。需要植皮的残余缺损使得植皮和供皮区都更小。最终,该技术通过简化和减小伤口大小降低了复杂并发症的风险。