Suppr超能文献

在婴儿中启动无创呼吸支持时,气道正压实验室滴定是否总是必要的?

Is Positive Airway Pressure Lab-Titration Always Necessary to Start Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Infants?

作者信息

Dudoignon Benjamin, Abdelkarim Rim, Delclaux Christophe, Bokov Plamen

机构信息

Physiology and Pediatric Sleep Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, AP-HP - Centre de Référence Constitutif Maladies respiratoires rares - Hypoventilations alvéolaires rares - Syndrome d'Ondine, INSERM NeuroDiderot, Paris, France.

Pediatric Unit, Centre Hospitalier Rene Dubos, Pontoise, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Aug;60(8):e71233. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71233.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) initiation should ideally be conducted through CPAP titration in a sleep laboratory according to the American Academy of sleep Medicine recommendations. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of two continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration methods-short-supervised in-sleep-laboratory titration and longer, unsupervised hospitalization-based titration-in children under 2 years requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

METHODS

The participants were allocated based on sleep laboratory availability, with the short-supervised procedure involving in-lab nap polysomnography and pressure adjustments, while the long-unsupervised approach involved hospitalization, the ventilator's built-in software analysis, and overnight gas exchange-based guidance.

RESULTS

The study included 46 infants between January 2022 and November 2024. Both groups were similar in terms of OSAS severity, achieved similar pressure levels at discharge, and demonstrated comparable outcomes in home nocturnal gas exchange (HNGE), including oxygen saturation and CO levels. Adherence was higher in the long-unsupervised group, potentially due to a higher number of therapeutic education sessions afforded by the longer hospitalization. Importantly, no significant differences were observed in the primary outcome of HNGE, with failure of titration observed in two patients (8%) in the short-supervised titration group and four patients (19%) in the long-unsupervised titration group (p = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that both titration procedures are feasible and equally effective for initial CPAP/NIV management in infants. Therefore, the choice of method can be tailored to clinical settings and resource availability, with the longer hospital-based titration offering an acceptable alternative to traditional laboratory titration, potentially reducing medical supervision demands while maintaining treatment efficacy.

摘要

背景

根据美国睡眠医学学会的建议,理想情况下,持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的启动应通过睡眠实验室中的CPAP滴定来进行。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估两种持续气道正压通气(CPAP)滴定方法——短时间有监督的睡眠实验室滴定和长时间无监督的基于住院治疗的滴定——在2岁以下因重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)需要无创通气(NIV)的儿童中的疗效。

方法

根据睡眠实验室的可用性对参与者进行分配,短时间有监督的程序包括实验室午睡多导睡眠图和压力调整,而长时间无监督的方法包括住院治疗、呼吸机的内置软件分析以及基于夜间气体交换的指导。

结果

该研究纳入了2022年1月至2024年11月期间的46名婴儿。两组在OSAS严重程度方面相似,出院时达到相似的压力水平,并且在家庭夜间气体交换(HNGE)方面表现出可比的结果,包括血氧饱和度和一氧化碳水平。长时间无监督组的依从性更高,这可能是由于较长时间的住院提供了更多的治疗教育课程。重要的是,在HNGE的主要结果方面未观察到显著差异,短时间有监督滴定组有2名患者(8%)滴定失败,长时间无监督滴定组有4名患者(19%)滴定失败(p = 0.390)。

结论

研究结果表明,两种滴定程序对于婴儿初始CPAP/NIV管理都是可行且同样有效的。因此,可以根据临床环境和资源可用性来选择方法,基于住院治疗的较长时间滴定为传统实验室滴定提供了一种可接受的替代方案,有可能在保持治疗效果的同时减少医疗监督需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ec/12333326/17cb14e3a0e7/PPUL-60-0-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验