• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波前引导与地形图引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术的前瞻性、随机、对侧眼比较。

Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of wavefront-guided and topography-guided LASIK.

作者信息

Lu Louisa, Manche Edward

机构信息

From the Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Oct 1;51(10):889-894. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001703.

DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001703
PMID:40778939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12447821/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes of eyes treated with ocular wavefront-guided (OWFG) LASIK vs topography-guided (TG) LASIK.

SETTING

Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, California.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye-controlled trial. Treatments were randomized according to ocular dominance.

METHODS

This study treated patients with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism with OWFG-LASIK (planned using the iDesign Advanced WaveScan Studio System aberrometer) in 1 eye and TG-LASIK (planned using the Contoura Vision and WaveLight Topolyzer Vario) in the fellow eye from January 2023 to April 2024. Postoperative evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and consisted of visual acuity, manifest refraction, 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration).

RESULTS

100 eyes of 50 patients with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism were enrolled in the study and underwent successful treatments. 96 eyes of 48 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. At postoperative month 12, there were no statistically significant differences between the OWFG-LASIK and TG-LASIK groups for spherical equivalent ( P > .05); HOAs, including coma, trefoil, and spherical aberrations ( P > .05); proportion of eyes that had ≥20/20 uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (100% in the OWFG-LASIK group vs 98% in the TG-LASIK group); or proportion of eyes that had improved 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity. Eyes randomized to OWFG-LASIK had a significant greater percentage of eyes achieving UDVA of 20/12.5 compared with TG-LASIK ( P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

OWFG LASIK and TG LASIK achieve similar refractive results with excellent clinical outcomes and excellent predictability in both groups.

摘要

目的

比较眼波前引导(OWFG)准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与地形引导(TG)LASIK治疗眼睛的视觉效果。

地点

加利福尼亚州斯坦福大学拜尔斯眼科研究所。

设计

前瞻性、随机、对侧眼对照试验。治疗根据眼优势进行随机分配。

方法

本研究于2023年1月至2024年4月,对一只眼睛采用OWFG-LASIK(使用iDesign高级波前像差仪系统进行规划),对另一只眼睛采用TG-LASIK(使用Contoura Vision和WaveLight Topolyzer Vario进行规划)治疗近视或复合性近视散光患者。术后1、3、6和12个月进行评估,包括视力、显验光、5%和25%低对比度视力以及高阶像差(HOAs)(彗差、三叶草像差和球差)。

结果

50例近视或复合性近视散光患者的100只眼睛纳入研究并成功接受治疗。48例患者的96只眼睛完成了12个月的随访。术后12个月时,OWFG-LASIK组和TG-LASIK组在等效球镜度(P>.05)、包括彗差、三叶草像差和球差的高阶像差(P>.05)、未矫正远视力(UDVA)≥20/20的眼睛比例(OWFG-LASIK组为100%,TG-LASIK组为98%)或5%和25%低对比度视力改善的眼睛比例方面,均无统计学显著差异。与TG-LASIK相比,随机分配至OWFG-LASIK的眼睛中,达到20/12.5 UDVA的眼睛比例显著更高(P=.003)。

结论

OWFG LASIK和TG LASIK在两组中均取得了相似的屈光结果,具有良好的临床效果和出色的可预测性。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of wavefront-guided and topography-guided LASIK.波前引导与地形图引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术的前瞻性、随机、对侧眼比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Oct 1;51(10):889-894. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001703.
2
Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Automated Customized Ray-Tracing-Guided versus Wavefront-Optimized LASIK.自动定制光线追踪引导与波前优化准分子原位角膜磨镶术的前瞻性个体内比较
Ophthalmology. 2025 Oct;132(10):1169-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3
Visual Acuity and Quality of Life Results in a Randomized Trial of Topography-Guided LASIK With GIS Software Versus Wavefront-Optimized LASIK.使用地理信息系统(GIS)软件的地形引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与波前优化LASIK随机试验中的视力和生活质量结果
J Refract Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):e625-e634. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250509-01. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
4
Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes. topography-guided 与 wavefront-optimized 激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视:手术效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jul;45(7):959-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
[Comparison of visual outcomes between corneal topography-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a network meta-analysis].角膜地形图引导的飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及近视散光的视觉效果比较:一项网状Meta分析
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 11;60(12):1004-1012. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240108-00014.
6
A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. topography-guided 与 wavefront-optimized FS-LASIK 矫正近视与近视散光的随机对照研究。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):575-582. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190819-01.
7
Prospective, Randomized Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Refractive Surgeries.波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术屈光手术的前瞻性、随机对侧眼比较
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 May;237:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.013. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
8
Comparison of Wavefront-Optimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK.LASIK中波前优化消融术与采用LYRA方案的角膜地形图引导Contoura消融术的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Apr 1;35(4):222-229. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190304-02.
9
Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.前瞻性、随机、对照眼研究:波前引导与波前优化 LASIK 手术的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;207:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.地形引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后患者报告的结果及高阶像差
Cornea. 2025 Apr 1;44(4):468-474. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003581. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Higher-Order Aberrations of Topography-Guided LASIK and Wavefront-Optimized LASIK in High- and Low-Myopic Eyes: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.高度近视和低度近视眼中地形引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术和波前优化准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术的高阶像差:一项非随机对照试验。
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 24;13(3):399. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030399.
3
Clinical and refractive outcomes after topography-guided refractive surgery planned using Phorcides surgery planning software.应用 Phorcides 手术规划软件行角膜地形图引导的屈光手术的临床和屈光结果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Sep 1;48(9):1010-1015. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000910.
4
Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized LASIK for Myopia With and Without Astigmatism: A Meta-analysis. topography-guided 与 wavefront-optimized LASIK 治疗近视伴或不伴散光的荟萃分析
J Refract Surg. 2021 Oct;37(10):707-714. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210709-01. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
Clinical Outcomes After Topography-Guided Refractive Surgery in Eyes with Myopia and Astigmatism - Comparing Results with New Planning Software to Those Obtained Using the Manifest Refraction.近视和散光眼行角膜地形图引导屈光手术后的临床结果——新规划软件与根据显然验光结果所获结果的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov 17;14:3975-3982. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S280959. eCollection 2020.
6
Clinical outcomes after topography-guided LASIK: comparing results based on a new topography analysis algorithm with those based on manifest refraction.角膜地形图引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术的临床结果:基于一种新的角膜地形图分析算法的结果与基于明显屈光不正的结果比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jun;46(6):814-819. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000176.
7
SMILE, Topography-Guided LASIK, and Wavefront-Guided LASIK: Review of Clinical Outcomes in Premarket Approval FDA Studies.SMILE、地形引导 LASIK 和波前引导 LASIK:FDA 上市前批准研究中临床结果的回顾。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Nov 1;35(11):690-698. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190930-02.
8
Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes. topography-guided 与 wavefront-optimized 激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视:手术效果。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jul;45(7):959-965. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
9
Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.前瞻性、随机、对照眼研究:波前引导与波前优化 LASIK 手术的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;207:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Patient-reported vision-related quality of life after bilateral wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.双眼波前引导 LASIK 术后患者报告的视觉相关生活质量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):752-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.013. Epub 2019 Mar 4.