Karadag Duygu Temiz, Gokcen Neslihan, Yazici Ayten, Cefle Ayse, Bes Cemal
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, İzmit, 41380, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Rheumatology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Aug 8;45(8):187. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05955-8.
Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a potentially life-threatening complication of RA, yet standardized screening guidelines are lacking. This study aimed to explore current screening practices among Turkish rheumatologists and assess how demographic and institutional factors influence clinical decision-making.
An electronic survey was distributed to 550 members of the Turkish Society for Rheumatology between May and June 2024. The questionnaire included items on respondents' clinical experience, practice settings, estimated RA-ILD prevalence, screening criteria, and preferred diagnostic methods.
A total of 107 rheumatologists completed the survey (response rate: 20%). Most participants (59.8%) worked in university hospitals and 44.9% had ≤ 5 years of clinical experience. Over half (52.3%) estimated the frequency of RA-ILD in their patients to be 5-10%. Nearly half of the rheumatologists (47.7%) screened RA patients with respiratory symptoms. The three most frequently used screening methods were chest computed tomography (CT) (77.6%), chest X-ray (72.9%), and pulmonary function testing (PFT) (65.4%). While 20% of participants reported using only a single method for screening, the most preferred combination was chest X-ray, CT, PFT, and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), used by 20.6% of respondents. Compared to university hospitals, rheumatologists working in state hospitals reported fewer opportunities for pulmonary assessments, limited access to DLCO testing, less collaboration with experienced radiologists or pulmonologists, and a lack of multidisciplinary approaches.
Our study highlights the variability in disease assessment and clinical practices related to RA-ILD screening among rheumatologists. These findings underscore the need to standardize screening strategies, taking into account national healthcare conditions and the local working environments of rheumatologists.
类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺病(RA - ILD)是类风湿关节炎一种潜在的危及生命的并发症,但缺乏标准化的筛查指南。本研究旨在探讨土耳其风湿病学家当前的筛查实践,并评估人口统计学和机构因素如何影响临床决策。
2024年5月至6月期间,向土耳其风湿病学会的550名成员发放了电子调查问卷。问卷包括有关受访者临床经验、执业环境、估计的RA - ILD患病率、筛查标准以及首选诊断方法的项目。
共有107名风湿病学家完成了调查(回复率:20%)。大多数参与者(59.8%)在大学医院工作,44.9%有≤5年的临床经验。超过一半(52.3%)的人估计其患者中RA - ILD的发生率为5 - 10%。近一半的风湿病学家(47.7%)对有呼吸道症状的类风湿关节炎患者进行筛查。三种最常用的筛查方法是胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)(77.6%)、胸部X线(72.9%)和肺功能测试(PFT)(65.4%)。虽然20%的参与者报告仅使用单一方法进行筛查,但最受欢迎的组合是胸部X线、CT、PFT和肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO),20.6%的受访者使用该组合。与大学医院相比,在公立医院工作的风湿病学家报告的肺部评估机会较少、进行DLCO检测的机会有限、与经验丰富的放射科医生或肺科医生合作较少以及缺乏多学科方法。
我们的研究突出了风湿病学家在RA - ILD筛查相关疾病评估和临床实践方面的差异。这些发现强调了考虑国家医疗状况和风湿病学家当地工作环境来标准化筛查策略的必要性。