Aulicino Matteo, Ferracci Federica, Abatini Carlo, Lodoli Claudio, Di Giorgio Andrea, Attalla El Halabieh Miriam, D'Annibale Giorgio, Orsini Cecilia, Barberis Lorenzo, Gallotta Valerio, Pacelli Fabio, Santullo Francesco
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12026-3.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex and lengthy surgical procedure involving multi-visceral resection, characterized by a steep and non-standardized learning curve. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery has faced significant challenges in being adopted for cytoreduction of peritoneal metastases. However, advancements in laparoscopic techniques have gradually allowed the adoption, in a limited and selected patient population, of laparoscopy as a less invasive approach, while still enabling maximal tumor debulking. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic CRS (L-CRS) and open cytoreductive surgery (O-CRS) with or without HIPEC, using propensity score matching analysis.
This retrospective, single-center study analyzed data from 364 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC for a primary peritoneal tumor or with peritoneal carcinomatosis from various origins between January 2016 and December 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis included the surgical technique (Open-CRS vs. Laparoscopic-CRS) as the dependent variable and baseline characteristics as covariates in a logistic regression model. The two postmatching groups, O-CRS and L-CRS, were compared regarding intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.
There were no significant differences in operative time (L-CRS/HIPEC: 372 min vs. O-CRS/HIPEC: 457 min; p = 0.754). Complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in all patients in both groups. L-CRS/HIPEC patients showed faster oral intake (2 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.035), the earlier passage of first flatus (3 days vs. 5 days; p = 0.043), shorter hospital stay (5 days vs. 7 days; p = 0.047), and quicker recovery to chemotherapy (29 days vs. 43 days; p = 0.024).
L-CRS offers selected patients a faster clinical recovery, shorter hospital stay, and quicker return to systemic chemotherapy. Nonetheless, prospective randomized trials are necessary to establish robust selection criteria and to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes.
细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)是一种复杂且耗时的外科手术,涉及多脏器切除,其学习曲线陡峭且不标准化。因此,腹腔镜手术在用于腹膜转移瘤的细胞减灭方面面临重大挑战。然而,腹腔镜技术的进步已逐渐允许在有限的特定患者群体中采用腹腔镜手术作为一种侵入性较小的方法,同时仍能实现最大程度的肿瘤切除。本研究的目的是使用倾向评分匹配分析比较腹腔镜CRS(L-CRS)与开腹细胞减灭术(O-CRS)在联合或不联合HIPEC情况下的短期结局。
这项回顾性单中心研究分析了2016年1月至2023年12月期间364例因原发性腹膜肿瘤或各种来源的腹膜癌病接受CRS + HIPEC的患者的数据。倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析将手术技术(开腹CRS与腹腔镜CRS)作为逻辑回归模型中的因变量,基线特征作为协变量。对匹配后的两组,即O-CRS组和L-CRS组,就术中及术后短期结局进行比较。
手术时间无显著差异(L-CRS/HIPEC:372分钟 vs. O-CRS/HIPEC:457分钟;p = 0.754)。两组所有患者均实现了完全细胞减灭(CC-0)。L-CRS/HIPEC患者的经口进食恢复更快(2天 vs. 3天;p = 0.035),首次排气更早(3天 vs. 5天;p = 0.043),住院时间更短(5天 vs. 7天;p = 0.047),恢复化疗更快(29天 vs. 43天;p = 0.024)。
L-CRS为特定患者提供了更快的临床恢复、更短的住院时间以及更快恢复全身化疗的机会。尽管如此,仍需要进行前瞻性随机试验以建立可靠的选择标准并评估长期肿瘤学结局。