Jiang Huanyu, Zhou Lijuan, Zhang Qingyu, Yu Tongbo, Yu Zhenkun
School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Med Phys. 2025 Aug;52(8):e18028. doi: 10.1002/mp.18028.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a poor prognosis, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is variable. The T cell-inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) predicts immunotherapy efficacy but relies on invasive methods. Radiomics offers a noninvasive alternative for integrating imaging features with GEP in HNSCC.
To develop a radiomics-based model to determine the predictive value of GEP and immunotherapeutic responses on HNSCC.
GEP scores were derived using HNSCC data in The Cancer Genome Atlas. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate landmark analysis, Cox regression, and subgroup interaction tests were used to evaluate the prognostic value of GEP for overall survival (OS) in HNSCC. Radiomic features were extracted from computed tomography images in The Cancer Imaging Archive. The prediction model was constructed on the training dataset using a gradient boosting machine (GBM). The model's predictive performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Radiomics scores (RS) were calculated using the GBM model to predict the probability of GEP scores and subsequently categorized into binary variables. The prognostic value of RS in HNSCC was then assessed. Additionally, we conducted gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), immune gene expression profiling, mutation analysis, immune infiltration assessment, and immunophenoscore (IPS) evaluation to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying differences in GEP and RS.
A high GEP score is a protective factor for OS in HNSCC. (hazard ratio [HR], 0.692; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.501-0.956; p = 0.026). The GBM prognostic prediction model demonstrated strong clinical utility (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.827 and 0.774 in training and validation sets). RS was higher in GEP-high patients (p < 0.001) and correlated with longer OS (p = 0.034). GSEA revealed enrichment in oxidative phosphorylation and ribosome pathways in high RS patients. Additionally, RS-high patients exhibited increased M1 macrophage infiltration and elevated IPS for both CTLA-4 combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (p < 0.01) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone (p < 0.05). TIGIT expression was significantly upregulated (p < 0.0001), and NOTCH1 and DNAH5 mutations were more frequent in the high RS group.
The radiomics-based model predicts GEP and provides prognostic insights in HNSCC. RS-high patients may benefit from immunotherapy, highlighting the potential of integrating radiomics and transcriptomics in precision oncology.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)预后较差,对免疫检查点抑制剂的反应存在差异。T细胞炎症基因表达谱(GEP)可预测免疫治疗疗效,但依赖侵入性方法。放射组学为HNSCC中整合影像特征与GEP提供了一种非侵入性替代方法。
建立基于放射组学的模型,以确定GEP和免疫治疗反应对HNSCC的预测价值。
使用癌症基因组图谱中的HNSCC数据得出GEP评分。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、单变量标志性分析、Cox回归和亚组交互检验来评估GEP对HNSCC总生存(OS)的预后价值。从癌症影像存档中的计算机断层扫描图像提取放射组学特征。使用梯度提升机(GBM)在训练数据集上构建预测模型。使用受试者操作特征曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析评估模型的预测性能。使用GBM模型计算放射组学评分(RS),以预测GEP评分的概率,随后将其分类为二元变量。然后评估RS在HNSCC中的预后价值。此外,我们进行了基因集富集分析(GSEA)、免疫基因表达谱分析、突变分析、免疫浸润评估和免疫表型评分(IPS)评估,以探索GEP和RS差异背后的分子机制。
高GEP评分是HNSCC患者OS的保护因素(风险比[HR],0.692;95%置信区间[CI],0.501 - 0.956;p = 0.026)。GBM预后预测模型显示出强大的临床实用性(训练集和验证集的曲线下面积[AUC]分别为0.827和0.774)。GEP高的患者RS更高(p < 0.001),且与更长的OS相关(p = 0.034)。GSEA显示高RS患者的氧化磷酸化和核糖体途径富集。此外,RS高的患者在CTLA-4联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(p < 0.01)和单独使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂(p < 0.05)时,M1巨噬细胞浸润增加且IPS升高。TIGIT表达显著上调(p < 0.0001),高RS组中NOTCH1和DNAH5突变更频繁。
基于放射组学的模型可预测GEP,并为HNSCC提供预后见解。RS高的患者可能从免疫治疗中获益,突出了在精准肿瘤学中整合放射组学和转录组学的潜力。