Suppr超能文献

呼吁规范C肽检测

Call for Standardization of C-Peptide Measurement.

作者信息

Schleicher Erwin, Kabytaev Kuanysh, Nauck Matthias, Müller-Wieland Dirk, Peter Andreas, Little Randie R, Heinemann Lutz

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Department for Diagnostic Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases, Helmholtz Centre Munich, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 8:19322968251362848. doi: 10.1177/19322968251362848.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An impaired β-cell function is a key contributor to the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus that can be estimated by the biomarker C-peptide. Measurement of C-peptide can therefore be used for prediction, diagnosis, and subclassification of diabetes. Furthermore, C-peptide assists in the prediction of therapeutic response and guiding therapeutic decisions. To support diabetes classification, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) have recently introduced serum C-peptide cut-off values in their guidelines: <0.2 nmol/L C-peptide levels suggest the presence of type 1 DM while C-peptide levels >0.6 nmol/L indicate type 2 DM. However, analytical aspects limit the clinical utility of these defined cut-off values since standardization of C-peptide measurements has not been achieved. Results from different assay manufacturers still show significant variability.

RESULTS

This discrepancy can have significant consequences, as reliance on C-peptide testing for diabetes classification and therapeutic decisions has steadily increased in recent years. Although there have been growing calls to standardize C-peptide testing and a process for standardization has been established, standardization has unfortunately yet to be implemented in practice.

CONCLUSION

It therefore seems appropriate for health care providers to advocate for standardized C-peptide measurements, which is more or less in the hands of the manufacturer of the C-peptide assays, to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient safety.

摘要

背景

β细胞功能受损是糖尿病病理生理学的关键因素,可通过生物标志物C肽进行评估。因此,C肽测量可用于糖尿病的预测、诊断和亚分类。此外,C肽有助于预测治疗反应并指导治疗决策。为支持糖尿病分类,美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)最近在其指南中引入了血清C肽临界值:C肽水平<0.2 nmol/L提示1型糖尿病,而C肽水平>0.6 nmol/L表明2型糖尿病。然而,由于C肽测量的标准化尚未实现,分析方面限制了这些定义临界值的临床应用。不同检测制造商的结果仍显示出显著差异。

结果

这种差异可能会产生重大后果,因为近年来,依靠C肽检测进行糖尿病分类和治疗决策的情况一直在稳步增加。尽管越来越多的人呼吁对C肽检测进行标准化,并且已经建立了标准化流程,但遗憾的是,标准化尚未在实践中实施。

结论

因此,医疗保健提供者倡导进行标准化的C肽测量似乎是合适的,这或多或少掌握在C肽检测制造商手中,以提高诊断准确性和患者安全性。

相似文献

1
Call for Standardization of C-Peptide Measurement.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 8:19322968251362848. doi: 10.1177/19322968251362848.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
[Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)].
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 12;48(3):208-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601.
7
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 14;63(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1260. Print 2025 May 26.
2
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S27-S49. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S002.
4
A Golden Hour and Golden Opportunity for β-Cell Preservation.
Diabetes. 2024 Jun 1;73(6):834-836. doi: 10.2337/dbi24-0019.
5
Reference Standards for C-Peptide in Korean Population: A Korean Endocrine Hormone Reference Standard Data Center Study.
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2024 Jun;39(3):489-499. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1888. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
Endpoints for clinical trials in type 1 diabetes drug development.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 May;12(5):297-299. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00097-4.
7
Definition, Classification, Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus: Update 2023.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024 Mar;132(3):112-124. doi: 10.1055/a-2166-6643. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
Standardisation and harmonisation of thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements: historical, current, and future perspectives.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Jan 31;62(5):824-829. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-1332. Print 2024 Apr 25.
10
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S20-S42. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验