Zentall S S, Falkenberg S D, Smith L B
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1985 Dec;13(4):501-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00923137.
The optimal stimulation theory proposes that hyperactive children are less tolerant of lower levels of arousal than nonhyperactive children and should thus derive greater gains from stimulation added to repetitive copying tasks than do comparisons. To test this hypothesis, 16 adolescents, rating high on attention and behavior problems, were matched on the basis of age and poor handwriting performance to 16 controls. Matched pairs were randomly assigned to treatment order (high-stimulation colored letters followed in 2 weeks by low-stimulation black letters or the reverse order) and to level of information (color added to difficult letter parts or added to randomly selected letters), counterbalanced for treatment order and level of information within each order. Errors and activity were subjected to a mixed-design analysis of covariance, with IQ the covariate. The major findings indicated that attention-problem adolescents performed better with high-stimulation task stimuli than with low, relative to the opposite performance pattern of controls. Different responding was significant for experimental but not for control children.
最佳刺激理论认为,相较于无多动症状的儿童,多动儿童对较低水平的唤醒状态耐受性更差,因此,相较于对照组儿童,在重复性抄写任务中增加刺激会让多动儿童收获更多。为验证这一假设,研究人员选取了16名在注意力和行为问题方面得分较高的青少年,根据年龄和较差的书写表现,将他们与16名对照组人员进行匹配。匹配好的对子被随机分配到治疗顺序(两周内先进行高刺激彩色字母测试,再进行低刺激黑色字母测试,或相反顺序)和信息水平(在难写的字母部分添加颜色,或在随机选择的字母上添加颜色),并在每个顺序内对治疗顺序和信息水平进行平衡处理。将智商作为协变量,对错误和活动情况进行协方差混合设计分析。主要研究结果表明,与对照组相反的表现模式相比,有注意力问题的青少年在高刺激任务刺激下的表现优于低刺激任务刺激。不同的反应对实验组儿童来说具有显著性,但对对照组儿童来说则不然。