Suppr超能文献

接受胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗时内镜检查过程中的误吸风险。

Aspiration Risk During Endoscopic Procedures While on GLP-1 Agonist Therapy.

作者信息

Stryelkina Maryana, Molina Robert, Janice Thomas, Ancha Anupama, Bejcek Justin, Ian Fladie, Mullarkey Michael, Johnson Christopher

机构信息

Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, TX, 76508, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, 2401 S. 31st Street, Temple, TX, 76508, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09307-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly prescribed for Type 2 diabetes and weight management. Given their effect on gastric emptying, concerns have emerged regarding aspiration risk during endoscopic procedures. While aspiration risk is recognized during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), data on GLP-1RA users-particularly those undergoing colonoscopy-are limited. This study evaluated aspiration risk in patients undergoing EGD versus colonoscopy while on GLP-1RA therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (18-70 years) who underwent EGD or colonoscopy at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Temple from July 2017 to July 2024. Patients were stratified by GLP-1RA use. The primary outcome was aspiration-related diagnosis within 30 days, identified via ICD-10 codes. Chi-square testing and logistic regression were used to assess associations.

RESULTS

Among 13,523 patients (7431 EGD; 6092 colonoscopy), 713 (5.3%) were GLP-1RA users. Aspiration events were more frequent following EGD than colonoscopy (adjusted OR = 2.36, P = 0.0200). No aspiration events occurred in GLP-1RA users. Multivariable analysis identified Black race as independently associated with increased aspiration risk (adjusted OR = 2.77, P = 0.0061), while higher BMI was associated with lower aspiration risk. GLP-1RA users had higher BMI and more frequent diabetes and gastroparesis, but no independent association with aspiration risk was observed.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration risk was significantly higher with EGD than colonoscopy, but GLP-1RA use did not increase aspiration risk for either procedure. These findings suggest that routine GLP-1RA use may not be associated with increased aspiration risk in the outpatient setting. Prospective studies are needed to guide risk-based peri-procedural management.

摘要

背景

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)越来越多地被用于治疗2型糖尿病和管理体重。鉴于其对胃排空的影响,人们对内窥镜检查过程中的误吸风险日益担忧。虽然在食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)期间误吸风险已得到认识,但关于GLP-1RA使用者的数据,尤其是接受结肠镜检查者的数据有限。本研究评估了接受EGD与结肠镜检查的患者在接受GLP-1RA治疗时的误吸风险。

方法

我们对2017年7月至2024年7月在贝勒斯科特与怀特医疗中心坦普尔接受EGD或结肠镜检查的成年患者(18至70岁)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者按是否使用GLP-1RA进行分层。主要结局是通过ICD-10编码确定的30天内与误吸相关的诊断。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归来评估相关性。

结果

在13523例患者(7431例EGD;6092例结肠镜检查)中,713例(5.3%)为GLP-1RA使用者。EGD后误吸事件比结肠镜检查更频繁(调整后的比值比=2.36,P=0.0200)。GLP-1RA使用者未发生误吸事件。多变量分析确定黑人种族与误吸风险增加独立相关(调整后的比值比=2.77,P=0.0061),而较高的体重指数与较低的误吸风险相关。GLP-1RA使用者体重指数较高,糖尿病和胃轻瘫更常见,但未观察到与误吸风险有独立关联。

结论

EGD的误吸风险显著高于结肠镜检查,但使用GLP-1RA并未增加这两种检查的误吸风险。这些发现表明,在门诊环境中常规使用GLP-1RA可能与误吸风险增加无关。需要进行前瞻性研究以指导基于风险的围手术期管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验