Kivuyo Nashivai, Amin Abdulrahaman, Gega Zephania, Akoko Larry
Department of Surgery, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Surgery, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03118-x.
BACKGROUND: The quality and completeness of surgery remains critical for optimal oncological outcomes in breast cancer. A key indicator of surgical completeness is the resection margin status, which should ideally be negative, indicated by no ink on invasive tumor. However, such data is rarely reported from sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics of women with non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent a mastectomy, and identify the factors influencing the resection margin status at a cancer hospital in Tanzania. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing clinical and pathological data of female patients, with a histologically confirmed breast cancer at stage I-III, who underwent a mastectomy at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania. Data were extracted from histopathology reports and clinical records, focusing on margin status and associated variables including age, tumor size (T-status), nodal involvement (N-status), histological subtype, grade, luminal subtype, laterality, and receipt of neo-adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was margin status post mastectomy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics, and chi-square tests were applied to assess associations between variables and margin status. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Out of the 1,020 patients analyzed, margin status was documented for 976 cases. Among these, 801 patients (82.1%) had negative margins, while 175 (17.9%) had positive or close margins; of the latter, 88.6% were positive and 11.4% close. Most patients with margin involvement (88%) had only a single margin affected. The deep margin was most frequently involved in 87% of patients with involved margins, followed by the superior margin in 57%. Margin involvement was significantly higher among younger patients, particularly those under 30 years of age (p < 0.001), and was also strongly associated with advanced T-status (p < 0.001), especially T4 tumors, where 31.7% had involved margins. No significant associations were found with histological subtype, luminal classification, laterality, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a high rate of margin positivity following mastectomy, largely driven by advanced tumor stage and young age at presentation. To improve surgical outcomes in low-resource settings, we recommend interventions to improve earlier diagnosis and expanded use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced disease.
背景:手术的质量和完整性对于乳腺癌获得最佳肿瘤学结局仍然至关重要。手术完整性的一个关键指标是切缘状态,理想情况下应为阴性,即浸润性肿瘤上无墨水标记。然而,撒哈拉以南非洲地区很少报告此类数据。本研究旨在描述接受乳房切除术的非转移性乳腺癌女性的临床特征,并确定坦桑尼亚一家癌症医院影响切缘状态的因素。 方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,分析了在坦桑尼亚穆希姆比利国家医院接受乳房切除术、组织学确诊为I - III期乳腺癌的女性患者的临床和病理数据。数据从组织病理学报告和临床记录中提取,重点关注切缘状态及相关变量,包括年龄、肿瘤大小(T分期)、淋巴结受累情况(N分期)、组织学亚型、分级、腔面亚型、患侧以及新辅助治疗的接受情况。主要结局是乳房切除术后的切缘状态。采用描述性统计来总结患者特征,并应用卡方检验评估变量与切缘状态之间的关联。统计学显著性设定为p < 0.05。 结果:在分析的1020例患者中,976例记录了切缘状态。其中,801例患者(82.1%)切缘阴性,而175例(17.9%)切缘阳性或接近阳性;后者中,88.6%为阳性,11.4%为接近阳性。大多数切缘受累患者(88%)仅一个切缘受影响。在切缘受累的患者中,87%的患者最常受累的是深部切缘,其次是上切缘,占57%。年轻患者,尤其是30岁以下患者,切缘受累显著更高(p < 0.001),并且也与晚期T分期密切相关(p < 0.001),特别是T4肿瘤,其中31.7%的患者切缘受累。未发现与组织学亚型、腔面分类、患侧、新辅助治疗的接受情况有显著关联。 结论:本研究显示乳房切除术后切缘阳性率较高,主要由肿瘤晚期和就诊时年龄较轻所致。为改善资源匮乏地区的手术结局,我们建议采取干预措施以改善早期诊断,并扩大对局部晚期疾病患者使用新辅助治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18
Health Technol Assess. 2006-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-4-7
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-16
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024-12
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-2
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023-10-20
Int J Equity Health. 2023-9-11