• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善病情抗风湿药物属性对类风湿关节炎患者的相对重要性

Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

作者信息

Poudel Nabin, Qian Jingjing, Garza Kimberly B, Zeng Peng, Curtis Jeffrey R, Ngorsuraches Surachat

机构信息

Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research (P-SHOR), University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 4;19:2319-2331. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S514920. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S514920
PMID:40785840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12333635/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The significance of fatigue reduction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well recognized. However, prior patient preference studies on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have not adequately explored the relative importance of fatigue reduction compared to other DMARD attributes or accounted for preference heterogeneity. The objective of this study is to determine the relative importance of DMARD attributes, including fatigue reduction, from the patient perspective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a web-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey among RA patients in the US. Six DMARD attributes were included: chance of pain reduced by 50% or more, chance of physical function improved by 50% or more, chance of fatigue reduced by 10 points or more, chance of serious side effects, the route and frequency of administration, and out-of-pocket cost per month. Choice sets were constructed using a Bayesian efficient design. Mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models were developed to determine preference weights and to calculate the conditional relative importance of each attribute.

RESULTS

Of 228 patients, the ML model showed that the chance of pain reduction had the highest conditional relative importance (2.4), followed by out-of-pocket cost (2.1), the chance of physical function improvement (1.6), the chance of fatigue reduction (1.5), the chance of experiencing serious adverse events (0.6), and the route and frequency of administration (0.09). Preference heterogeneity was observed. The LC model identified two patient classes. The chance of fatigue reduction and the out-of-pocket cost were the most important attributes for class 1 and class 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pain reduction, physical function improvement, fatigue reduction, and out-of-pocket cost were relatively important DMARD attributes for RA patients. However, the presence of preference heterogeneity underscores the need for individualized treatment. Future studies should explore fatigue preferences and generalizability in the broader RA population.

摘要

目的

类风湿关节炎(RA)中减轻疲劳的重要性已得到充分认可。然而,先前关于改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)的患者偏好研究并未充分探讨与其他DMARD属性相比减轻疲劳的相对重要性,也未考虑偏好异质性。本研究的目的是从患者角度确定DMARD属性(包括减轻疲劳)的相对重要性。

患者与方法

我们在美国的RA患者中进行了一项基于网络的离散选择实验(DCE)调查。纳入了六个DMARD属性:疼痛减轻50%或更多的几率、身体功能改善50%或更多的几率、疲劳减轻10分或更多的几率、严重副作用的几率、给药途径和频率以及每月自付费用。使用贝叶斯有效设计构建选择集。开发了混合逻辑(ML)模型和潜在类别(LC)模型来确定偏好权重并计算每个属性的条件相对重要性。

结果

在228名患者中,ML模型显示疼痛减轻的几率具有最高的条件相对重要性(2.4),其次是自付费用(2.1)、身体功能改善的几率(1.6)、疲劳减轻的几率(1.5)、发生严重不良事件的几率(0.6)以及给药途径和频率(0.09)。观察到偏好异质性。LC模型识别出两类患者。疲劳减轻的几率和自付费用分别是第1类和第2类最重要的属性。

结论

减轻疼痛、改善身体功能、减轻疲劳和自付费用是RA患者相对重要的DMARD属性。然而,偏好异质性的存在强调了个体化治疗的必要性。未来的研究应在更广泛的RA人群中探索疲劳偏好和普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/a8950a41f7e4/PPA-19-2319-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/948ffed8146e/PPA-19-2319-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/a9fef1c63fb9/PPA-19-2319-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/e127efb48aee/PPA-19-2319-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/a8950a41f7e4/PPA-19-2319-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/948ffed8146e/PPA-19-2319-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/a9fef1c63fb9/PPA-19-2319-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/e127efb48aee/PPA-19-2319-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5710/12333635/a8950a41f7e4/PPA-19-2319-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Relative Importance of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Attributes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.改善病情抗风湿药物属性对类风湿关节炎患者的相对重要性
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 4;19:2319-2331. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S514920. eCollection 2025.
2
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
3
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).生物制剂或托法替布单药治疗传统抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者:一项Cochrane系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437.
4
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于对甲氨蝶呤或其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不完全的类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183.
5
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis unsuccessfully treated with biologics: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎失败的患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 10;3(3):CD012591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012591.
6
Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Patients in Five Non-Western Countries.炎症性肠病患者对治疗属性的偏好:五个非西方国家患者的离散选择实验
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03249-w.
7
Preferences for Attachment Devices for Individuals with Lower-Limb Loss: A Discrete-Choice Study to Inform Regulatory Decisions.下肢缺失者对附着装置的偏好:一项为监管决策提供信息的离散选择研究。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 2;10(2):23814683251351044. doi: 10.1177/23814683251351044. eCollection 2025 Jul-Dec.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis.叶酸和亚叶酸用于减轻类风湿关节炎患者接受甲氨蝶呤治疗时的副作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD000951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000951.pub2.
10
Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis.甲氨蝶呤用于治疗类风湿关节炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD000957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000957.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Discrete-Choice Experiments: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.偏好异质性在离散选择实验中的考量:ISPOR 特别兴趣小组报告。
Value Health. 2022 May;25(5):685-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.012.
2
What Is Rheumatoid Arthritis?什么是类风湿关节炎?
JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0786.
3
Systematic review of quantitative preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis among patients and at-risk populations.类风湿关节炎患者和高危人群治疗方法的定量偏好研究的系统评价。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Feb 22;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02707-4.
4
Functional capacity vs side effects: treatment attributes to consider when individualising treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.功能容量与副作用:类风湿关节炎患者个体化治疗时需考虑的治疗属性。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Mar;41(3):695-704. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05961-8. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiment Studies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Biological Medicines.类风湿性关节炎生物药物离散选择实验研究的系统评价
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun 30;32(2):104-111. doi: 10.31138/mjr.32.2.104. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.2021年美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗指南
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;73(7):1108-1123. doi: 10.1002/art.41752. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
7
Pop a pill or give myself a shot? Patient perspectives of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug choice for rheumatoid arthritis.口服药物还是自我注射?类风湿关节炎患者对疾病修饰抗风湿药物选择的看法。
Joint Bone Spine. 2021 Jan;88(1):105053. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Systematic Literature Review of Residual Symptoms and an Unmet Need in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者残留症状的系统文献综述及未满足的需求。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Nov;73(11):1606-1616. doi: 10.1002/acr.24369. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Patient Preferences for Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.类风湿关节炎中疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗的患者偏好:系统评价。
J Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;47(2):176-187. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181165. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Patient preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.患者对类风湿关节炎治疗的偏好。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019 May;31(3):256-263. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000591.