Talih Tutkun, Sonmez Gokhan, Sozuer Erdogan M, Tombul Sevket Tolga, Kulturoglu Mahmut O, Islam Dogan G, Akyıldız Hızır Y, Demirtas Abdullah, Karaagac Mustafa, Dal Fatih
Department of General Surgery, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Aug 4;21:1219-1226. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S521002. eCollection 2025.
To evaluate the anastomotic leakage (AL) rates in cancerous and non-cancerous intestinal anastomoses and analyze the general risk factors for AL.
The primary endpoint of this study is to investigate whether there is a difference in terms of AL between patients who underwent sigmoid colon resection + colorectal anastomosis due to primary colon cancer (Group 1) and patients with a completely healthy colorectal region who underwent sigmoid colon resection + colorectal anastomosis for use in the orthotopic bladder during radical cystoprostatectomy (Group 2). The secondary endpoint, considering all the patients, is to evaluate and investigate the risk factors affecting the AL rates.
A total of 178 patients, including 63 (35.4%) patients in Group 1 and 115 (64.6%) patients in Group 2, were included in the study. The mean age of all patients was 61.7 ± 9.9 years, and there was no statistical difference between the mean ages of the groups (62.8 ± 11.3 vs 60.7 ± 6.1, p = 0.106, respectively). Thirty-six (20.2%) of the patients were female, and 142 (79.8%) were male. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of AL in the postoperative period. Postoperative AL was seen in three patients (4.8%) and six patients (5.2%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.642). According to univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis, the risk of AL increased in patients with comorbidities, in the presence of previous abdominal surgery, in patients with high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and patients with postoperative ileus (p values are 0.042, 0.010, 0.029 and 0.048, respectively).
Our data suggest that anastomosis due to colon cancer resection does not increase the risk of AL compared with healthy bowel anastomoses. In addition, some clinical factors have been found to compromise anastomotic safety and are risk factors for AL. In addition, some clinical factors have been found to endanger anastomotic safety and are risk factors for AL.
评估癌性与非癌性肠吻合术中吻合口漏(AL)的发生率,并分析AL的一般危险因素。
本研究的主要终点是调查因原发性结肠癌接受乙状结肠切除术+结直肠吻合术的患者(第1组)与在根治性膀胱前列腺切除术中为原位膀胱使用而接受乙状结肠切除术+结直肠吻合术的结直肠区域完全健康的患者(第2组)在AL方面是否存在差异。次要终点是考虑所有患者,评估和调查影响AL发生率的危险因素。
本研究共纳入178例患者,其中第1组63例(35.4%),第2组115例(64.6%)。所有患者的平均年龄为61.7±9.9岁,两组的平均年龄之间无统计学差异(分别为62.8±11.3岁和60.7±6.1岁,p = 0.106)。36例(20.2%)患者为女性,142例(79.8%)为男性。术后两组在AL方面无显著差异。第1组和第2组分别有3例(4.8%)和6例(5.2%)患者出现术后AL(p = 0.642)。根据单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,合并症患者、既往有腹部手术史患者、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值高的患者以及术后肠梗阻患者发生AL的风险增加(p值分别为0.042、0.010、0.029和0.048)。
我们的数据表明,与健康肠吻合术相比,结肠癌切除术后的吻合术不会增加AL的风险。此外,已发现一些临床因素会损害吻合口安全性,是AL的危险因素。此外,已发现一些临床因素会危及吻合口安全性,是AL的危险因素。