Danihel Ludovít, Cerny Marian, Dropco Ivor, Zrnikova Petra, Schnorrer Milan, Smolar Marek, Misanik Miloslav, Durdik Stefan
3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Surgical Department, Bory Penta Hospitals, 841 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;14(9):1092. doi: 10.3390/life14091092.
Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.
尽管结直肠手术取得了快速进展,但择期胃肠手术的发病率和死亡率仍起着重要作用。几十年来,关于将吻合口漏风险降至最低的预防措施一直存在激烈的讨论。当择期手术前的机械肠道准备这一关键假设之一被引入实践时,人们认为它会减少感染并发症和吻合口漏的数量。抗生素治疗的进展支持了口服抗生素与机械肠道准备的联合应用。在我们诊所进行的前瞻性研究中,我们在没有事先进行机械准备的情况下进行了左侧结直肠手术。2019年1月至2020年1月,所有纳入该研究的患者均在斯洛伐克布拉迪斯拉发夸美纽斯大学医学院第三外科诊所接受了手术并接受观察。作为对照组,我们使用了一组类似的接受机械肠道准备的患者。我们的观察组包括87例大肠左侧(乙状结肠弯曲部、降结肠、乙状结肠和直肠)肿瘤患者。26例患者进行了Dixon腹腔镜切除术。27例患者进行了乙状结肠腹腔镜切除术。12例患者手术开始时采用腹腔镜手术,但由于不利的解剖条件不得不改为开腹手术。保守治疗方法主要包括Dixon切除术(19例)、乙状结肠切除术(5例)、左侧半结肠切除术(6例)和Miles肿瘤切除术及直肠截肢术(4例)。我们的研究强调了这样一个事实,即机械肠道准备对结直肠感染患者并没有明确的益处,这对吻合口漏的发生有影响。