Suppr超能文献

术前机械性肠道准备不影响左侧结直肠癌手术中吻合口漏的发生率——一项单中心观察性研究

Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery-A Single Center Observational Study.

作者信息

Danihel Ludovít, Cerny Marian, Dropco Ivor, Zrnikova Petra, Schnorrer Milan, Smolar Marek, Misanik Miloslav, Durdik Stefan

机构信息

3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Surgical Department, Bory Penta Hospitals, 841 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;14(9):1092. doi: 10.3390/life14091092.

Abstract

Despite rapid advances in colorectal surgery, morbidity and mortality rates in elective gastrointestinal surgery play a significant role. For decades, there have been tempestuous discussions on preventative measures to minimize the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. When mechanical bowel preparation before an elective procedure, one of the key hypotheses, was introduced into practice, it was assumed that it would decrease the number of infectious complications and anastomotic dehiscence. The advancements in antibiotic treatment supported the concomitant administration of oral antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation. In the prospective study conducted at our clinic, we performed left-side colorectal procedures without prior mechanical preparation. All patients enrolled in the study underwent the surgery and were observed in the 3rd Surgical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia, from January 2019 to January 2020. As a control group, we used a similar group of patients with MBP. Our observed group included 87 patients with tumors in the left part of their large intestine (lineal flexure, descendent colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). Dixon laparoscopic resection was performed in 26 patients. Sigmoid laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 patients. In 12 patients, the procedure was started laparoscopically but had to be converted due to adverse anatomical conditions. The conservative approaches mostly included Dixon resections (19 patients), sigmoid colon resections (5 patients), left-side hemicolectomies (6 patients), and Miles' tumor resections, with rectal amputation (4 patients). Our study highlighted the fact that MBP does not have an unequivocal benefit for patients with colorectal infection, which has an impact on the development of anastomotic dehiscence.

摘要

尽管结直肠手术取得了快速进展,但择期胃肠手术的发病率和死亡率仍起着重要作用。几十年来,关于将吻合口漏风险降至最低的预防措施一直存在激烈的讨论。当择期手术前的机械肠道准备这一关键假设之一被引入实践时,人们认为它会减少感染并发症和吻合口漏的数量。抗生素治疗的进展支持了口服抗生素与机械肠道准备的联合应用。在我们诊所进行的前瞻性研究中,我们在没有事先进行机械准备的情况下进行了左侧结直肠手术。2019年1月至2020年1月,所有纳入该研究的患者均在斯洛伐克布拉迪斯拉发夸美纽斯大学医学院第三外科诊所接受了手术并接受观察。作为对照组,我们使用了一组类似的接受机械肠道准备的患者。我们的观察组包括87例大肠左侧(乙状结肠弯曲部、降结肠、乙状结肠和直肠)肿瘤患者。26例患者进行了Dixon腹腔镜切除术。27例患者进行了乙状结肠腹腔镜切除术。12例患者手术开始时采用腹腔镜手术,但由于不利的解剖条件不得不改为开腹手术。保守治疗方法主要包括Dixon切除术(19例)、乙状结肠切除术(5例)、左侧半结肠切除术(6例)和Miles肿瘤切除术及直肠截肢术(4例)。我们的研究强调了这样一个事实,即机械肠道准备对结直肠感染患者并没有明确的益处,这对吻合口漏的发生有影响。

相似文献

2
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD001544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4.
3
Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 7;2(2):CD014909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014909.pub2.
4
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.
6
[Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery].
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 25;75(2):79-85. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.75.2.79.
8
The Role of Bowel Preparation in Colorectal Surgery: Results of the 2012-2015 ACS-NSQIP Data.
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):671-677. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002568.
9
Laparoscopic colorectal resections with and without routine mechanical bowel preparation: A comparative study.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Jul 6;9:72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.004. eCollection 2016 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Sigmoid Colonic Anastomosis: A Comparative and Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Aug 4;21:1219-1226. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S521002. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Does mechanical bowel preparation really prevent complications after colorectal surgery depending on the lesion localization? A myth or fact?
Turk J Surg. 2023 Sep 27;39(3):222-230. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6059. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Optimized perioperative management (fast-track, ERAS) to enhance postoperative recovery in elective colorectal surgery.
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2022 Jun 23;17:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000413. eCollection 2022.
5
A Review of Bowel Preparation Before Colorectal Surgery.
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Apr;37(2):75-84. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.04.01. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Preparing the bowel for surgery: rethinking the strategy.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;16(12):708-709. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0214-y.
10
Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;14(6):356-365. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.20. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验