Duan Jinjuan, Wang Xing, Hou Chengjing, Yu Tong, Ju Xia, Wang Shengbin
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Anqing Medical Centre of Anhui Medical University, Affiliated Anqing Hospital of China Pharmaceutical University, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Aug 4;19:6687-6697. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S530296. eCollection 2025.
Compare the analgesic efficacy and safety profiles of oliceridine and morphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after laparoscopic total hysterectomy.
This prospective, double-blind trial randomly allocated 60 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic total hysterectomy in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oliceridine (group O) or morphine (group M) via PCIA. The primary endpoint was cough numerical rating scale (NRS) scores 6 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included cough/resting NRS scores at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (6 h cough NRS score excluded); 24-hour postoperative recovery quality using 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale. Exploratory indicators including hemodynamic parameters and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO) post intravenous analgesic loading dose. Safety indicators represented by the incidence of adverse events occurring within 72 hours postoperatively.
Group O demonstrated superior early analgesia with lower resting NRS (1.0 [1.0,1.0] vs 1.5 [1.0,2.0]; = 0.019) and cough NRS (1.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 2.5 [1.0-3.0]; = 0.003) at 0.5 h compared with group M, and analgesic efficacy was comparable thereafter (all > 0.05). Group O exhibited lower nausea/vomiting (33.3% vs 73.3%, = 0.002) and constipation (20.0% vs 53.3%, = 0.007) rates, along with higher 24-h QoR-15 scores (125.27 ± 10.11 vs 119.67 ± 8.49; = 0.024). Higher SpO in group O at 5 min ( = 0.003) and 10 min ( = 0.033) postloading doses. Meanwhile, group M demonstrated transient heart rate (HR) elevation at 5 min postloading dose, whereas group O exhibited no significant HR increases at any time point.
Oliceridine demonstrates analgesic efficacy comparable to morphine after laparoscopic total hysterectomy but exhibits superior safety by significantly reducing opioid-related adverse events and potentially accelerating postoperative recovery.
比较奥里替丁和吗啡在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)中的镇痛效果和安全性。
这项前瞻性、双盲试验将60例行择期腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者按1:1比例随机分配,通过PCIA接受奥里替丁(O组)或吗啡(M组)治疗。主要终点是术后6小时的咳嗽数字评分量表(NRS)得分。次要结局包括术后0.5、2、6、12、24和48小时的咳嗽/静息NRS得分(不包括6小时咳嗽NRS得分);使用15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表评估术后24小时的恢复质量。探索性指标包括静脉注射镇痛负荷剂量后的血流动力学参数和外周毛细血管血氧饱和度(SpO)。安全指标以术后72小时内发生不良事件的发生率表示。
与M组相比,O组在术后0.5小时表现出更好的早期镇痛效果,静息NRS更低(1.0 [1.0,1.0] 对1.5 [1.0,2.0];P = 0.019),咳嗽NRS更低(1.0 [1.0 - 2.0] 对2.5 [1.0 - 3.0];P = 0.003),此后镇痛效果相当(所有P > 0.05)。O组恶心/呕吐(33.3%对73.3%,P = 0.002)和便秘(20.0%对53.3%,P = 0.007)发生率更低,24小时QoR-15得分更高(125.27±10.11对119.67±8.49;P = 0.024)。O组在负荷剂量后5分钟(P = 0.003)和10分钟(P = 0.033)时SpO更高。同时,M组在负荷剂量后5分钟出现短暂心率(HR)升高,而O组在任何时间点均未出现明显HR升高。
奥里替丁在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后的镇痛效果与吗啡相当,但通过显著减少阿片类药物相关不良事件并可能加速术后恢复,表现出更好的安全性。