Chin Patrick, Veldhuis Stephen C
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, L8S 4L8 Hamilton, ON Canada.
Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2025;139(9-10):5043-5056. doi: 10.1007/s00170-025-16195-2. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
Accurate tracking of modal characteristics is a valuable diagnostic tool for condition monitoring of machine tool spindle units. While experimental modal analysis (EMA) is the conventional method used for machine tool modal identification, it is often impractical to implement in production settings due to the invasive and manual nature of the impact hammer test. In this study, a new technique for operational modal analysis (OMA) based on output-only vibration measurements obtained during a milling operation with variable spindle speed is proposed. Modal identification is performed using two OMA standard methods, namely stochastic subspace identification (SSI) and frequency domain decomposition (FDD). The modal characteristics are compared to values obtained from conventional EMA from impulse hammer testing on the static spindle, and from the operational spindle during cutting using force measurements collected by a table dynamometer. The percentage difference between the natural frequencies identified by the proposed OMA method and frequencies identified by conventional impulse hammer testing was less than 10%, and for the operational spindle during cutting tests, the difference was less than 3%. These results demonstrate the validity of a new modal identification method that can be practically implemented in production.
精确跟踪模态特性是用于机床主轴单元状态监测的一种有价值的诊断工具。虽然实验模态分析(EMA)是用于机床模态识别的传统方法,但由于冲击锤测试具有侵入性和手动性,在生产环境中实施往往不切实际。在本研究中,提出了一种基于在变主轴转速铣削操作期间获得的仅输出振动测量的运行模态分析(OMA)新技术。使用两种OMA标准方法进行模态识别,即随机子空间识别(SSI)和频域分解(FDD)。将模态特性与通过对静态主轴进行脉冲锤测试以及在切削过程中使用工作台测力计收集的力测量值从运行主轴获得的传统EMA值进行比较。所提出的OMA方法识别的固有频率与传统脉冲锤测试识别的频率之间的百分比差异小于10%,对于切削测试期间的运行主轴,差异小于3%。这些结果证明了一种可在生产中实际实施的新模态识别方法的有效性。