Huang Ruiyang, Ragheb Jacqueline
Department of Anesthesia, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Management, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 9;17(8):e89700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89700. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Patients with severe emphysematous bullae present significant anesthetic challenges, especially during laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgeries, where positive pressure ventilation and pneumoperitoneum increase the risk of barotrauma. Rupture of a bulla can cause life-threatening tension pneumothorax, and intervention may be delayed in robotic cases due to limited access. A 62-year-old male patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and extensive bilateral bullous disease was scheduled for robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Preoperative imaging revealed near-complete replacement of the upper right lung by giant bullae and substantial left-sided involvement. After a multidisciplinary discussion, the robotic approach was deemed unsafe due to the risk of bulla rupture during insufflation and positive pressure ventilation. Surgery was converted to an open repair under spinal anesthesia, with monitored anesthesia care using a propofol infusion. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, required no intraoperative airway intervention, and recovered without complication. This case highlights critical perioperative considerations in patients with bullous disease, including the limitations of chest tubes in decompressing a ruptured bulla with large bronchial communication, and the importance of individualized risk assessment beyond standard scoring systems. Preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary planning, and consideration of regional anesthesia can mitigate catastrophic complications. While alternative approaches such as regional blocks may offer a safer alternative for these patients, lung-protective ventilation strategies and avoidance of nitrous oxide are well-described for cases requiring general anesthesia. Patients with severe bullous emphysema require tailored perioperative planning. Early recognition, surgical approach modification, and the use of regional anesthesia can prevent life-threatening complications in high-risk non-thoracic surgeries.
患有严重肺气肿大疱的患者面临重大的麻醉挑战,尤其是在腹腔镜或机器人辅助手术期间,此时正压通气和气腹会增加气压伤的风险。大疱破裂可导致危及生命的张力性气胸,在机器人手术病例中,由于手术入路受限,干预可能会延迟。一名62岁男性患者,患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和广泛的双侧大疱性疾病,计划进行机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术。术前影像学检查显示,巨大肺大疱几乎完全取代了右上肺,左侧也有大量受累。经过多学科讨论,由于在气腹和正压通气过程中存在肺大疱破裂的风险,机器人手术方法被认为不安全。手术改为在脊髓麻醉下进行开放修补,并使用丙泊酚输注进行麻醉监测。患者血流动力学保持稳定,术中无需气道干预,术后恢复无并发症。该病例突出了大疱性疾病患者围手术期的关键注意事项,包括胸管在减压伴有大支气管交通的破裂大疱方面的局限性,以及超越标准评分系统进行个体化风险评估的重要性。术前影像学检查、多学科规划以及区域麻醉的考虑可以减轻灾难性并发症。虽然区域阻滞等替代方法可能为这些患者提供更安全的选择,但对于需要全身麻醉的病例,肺保护性通气策略和避免使用氧化亚氮已有详细描述。严重大疱性肺气肿患者需要量身定制围手术期规划。早期识别、手术方法调整以及区域麻醉的使用可以预防高风险非胸科手术中危及生命的并发症。