Rogalski Brandon L, Kane Liam T, Vaughan Alayna, Tzeuton Serge, Namdari Surena, Getz Charles L
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(7):420-425. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2025.81641.3717.
Distal biceps repair is a common orthopedic procedure, but there is still debate regarding the optimal post-operative care for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of at-home physical therapy compared to outpatient physical therapy following distal biceps tendon repair.
A retrospective review of distal biceps repairs performed between 2012 and 2017 by four fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution was undertaken. Patients were grouped into outpatient physical therapy and at-home therapy groups. Exclusion criteria included any patients who did not undergo a direct repair of the distal biceps and cases in which allograft augmentation was utilized. Postoperative complications were identified by manual chart review. After a minimum of three years follow-up, demographic information as well as elbow functional outcome scores including the Quick Dash, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Oxford Elbow Scores were obtained via phone calls and online surveys.
One hundred and forty-six patients were included in this study at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years for patients who attended outpatient physical therapy and 5.9 years for patients who performed an at-home therapy program. There were twenty-eight patients in the at-home physical therapy group and one hundred eighteen patients in the outpatient physical therapy group. There were two complications: one re-ruptured distal biceps tendon requiring a revision surgery in the at-home patient cohort, and one post-operative posterior interosseous nerve palsy that recovered after 6 months in the outpatient rehabilitation group. We found there was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the three functional elbow scores.
Patients undergoing routine distal biceps repair may achieve similar clinical outcomes with a regimented at-home physical therapy protocol in lieu of formal outpatient physical therapy.
肱二头肌远端修复是一种常见的骨科手术,但对于患者术后的最佳护理仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估肱二头肌远端肌腱修复术后家庭物理治疗与门诊物理治疗的效果。
对一家机构中四位接受过专科培训的骨科医生在2012年至2017年间进行的肱二头肌远端修复手术进行回顾性研究。患者被分为门诊物理治疗组和家庭治疗组。排除标准包括未进行肱二头肌远端直接修复的任何患者以及使用同种异体移植增强的病例。通过人工查阅病历确定术后并发症。在至少三年的随访后,通过电话和在线调查获得人口统计学信息以及肘部功能结果评分,包括快速短跑评分、梅奥肘部性能指数和牛津肘部评分。
本研究纳入了146例患者,接受门诊物理治疗的患者平均随访6.3年,进行家庭治疗计划的患者平均随访5.9年。家庭物理治疗组有28例患者,门诊物理治疗组有118例患者。有2例并发症:1例肱二头肌远端肌腱再次断裂,需要对家庭治疗组的患者进行翻修手术;1例术后骨间后神经麻痹,在门诊康复组6个月后恢复。我们发现,两组在三项肘部功能评分中的任何一项上均无显著差异。
接受常规肱二头肌远端修复的患者,采用严格的家庭物理治疗方案代替正规的门诊物理治疗,可能会取得相似的临床效果。