Tannenbaum Alex P, Lilley Cullen M, Mirza Kamran M
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, WI, USA.
UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sage Open Aging. 2025 Aug 9;11:30495334251365604. doi: 10.1177/30495334251365604. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are useful tools that assist healthcare workers with medical decision-making. With current laboratory establishment and verification techniques, older patients can be systematically excluded from the RI process. This in turn can lead to use of improper RIs that may not accurately reflect the normal physiologic variance of aging. Ethically, the use of improper RIs in older patients conflicts with the principles of justice and beneficence. By excluding older patients from laboratory RIs, any effects in this population's healthcare outcomes would reflect the intrinsic ageist structure of the current RI system. Ways to address this issue include active inclusion of older patients in establishment studies, or establishment of population specific RIs, though each solution has limitations. Use of artificial intelligence and informatics techniques also could prove useful in this endeavor. It is critical that healthcare providers understand these challenges when treating this population.
实验室参考区间(RIs)是有助于医护人员进行医疗决策的有用工具。利用当前的实验室建立和验证技术,老年患者可能会被系统地排除在参考区间制定过程之外。这进而可能导致使用不恰当的参考区间,而这些区间可能无法准确反映衰老过程中的正常生理差异。从伦理上讲,在老年患者中使用不恰当的参考区间与公正和行善原则相冲突。通过将老年患者排除在实验室参考区间之外,这一人群医疗结果中的任何影响都将反映当前参考区间系统内在的年龄歧视结构。解决这一问题的方法包括在制定研究中积极纳入老年患者,或建立针对特定人群的参考区间,不过每种解决方案都有局限性。人工智能和信息学技术的应用在这一努力中也可能被证明是有用的。医疗服务提供者在治疗这一人群时了解这些挑战至关重要。