Suppr超能文献

我们应如何解读老年患者的“异常”实验室检查结果?美国建立和验证实验室参考区间的伦理与实际挑战。

How Should We Interpret "Abnormal" Lab Results in Older Patients? Ethical and Practical Challenges of Establishing and Verifying Laboratory Reference Intervals in the United States.

作者信息

Tannenbaum Alex P, Lilley Cullen M, Mirza Kamran M

机构信息

University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, WI, USA.

UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Sage Open Aging. 2025 Aug 9;11:30495334251365604. doi: 10.1177/30495334251365604. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Laboratory reference intervals (RIs) are useful tools that assist healthcare workers with medical decision-making. With current laboratory establishment and verification techniques, older patients can be systematically excluded from the RI process. This in turn can lead to use of improper RIs that may not accurately reflect the normal physiologic variance of aging. Ethically, the use of improper RIs in older patients conflicts with the principles of justice and beneficence. By excluding older patients from laboratory RIs, any effects in this population's healthcare outcomes would reflect the intrinsic ageist structure of the current RI system. Ways to address this issue include active inclusion of older patients in establishment studies, or establishment of population specific RIs, though each solution has limitations. Use of artificial intelligence and informatics techniques also could prove useful in this endeavor. It is critical that healthcare providers understand these challenges when treating this population.

摘要

实验室参考区间(RIs)是有助于医护人员进行医疗决策的有用工具。利用当前的实验室建立和验证技术,老年患者可能会被系统地排除在参考区间制定过程之外。这进而可能导致使用不恰当的参考区间,而这些区间可能无法准确反映衰老过程中的正常生理差异。从伦理上讲,在老年患者中使用不恰当的参考区间与公正和行善原则相冲突。通过将老年患者排除在实验室参考区间之外,这一人群医疗结果中的任何影响都将反映当前参考区间系统内在的年龄歧视结构。解决这一问题的方法包括在制定研究中积极纳入老年患者,或建立针对特定人群的参考区间,不过每种解决方案都有局限性。人工智能和信息学技术的应用在这一努力中也可能被证明是有用的。医疗服务提供者在治疗这一人群时了解这些挑战至关重要。

相似文献

6
[Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)].[支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 12;48(3):208-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601.
7
Electric fans for reducing adverse health impacts in heatwaves.用于减少热浪期间不良健康影响的电风扇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009888.pub2.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

9
Online geriatric education for health professions students.面向健康专业学生的在线老年医学教育。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2725-2727. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17915. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验