Gupta Saurabh, Carmichael Catriona, Simpson Christina, Clarke Mike J, Allen Claire, Gao Yang, Chan Emily Y Y, Murray Virginia
Extreme Events andHealth Protection Section, Centre for Radiation, Chemicals and Environmental Hazards, London, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009888.pub2.
Heatwaves are hot weather events, which breach regional or national thresholds, that last for several days. They are likely to occur with increasing frequency in some parts of the world. The potential consequences were illustrated in Europe in August 2003 when there were an estimated 30,000 excess deaths due to a heatwave. Electric fans might be used with the intention of reducing the adverse health effects of a heatwave. Fans do not cool the ambient air but can be used to draw in cooler air from outside when placed at an open window. The aim of the fans would be to increase heat loss by increasing the efficiency of all normal methods of heat loss, but particularly by evaporation and convection methods. However, it should be noted that increased sweating can lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalances if these fluids and electrolytes are not replaced quickly enough. Research has also identified important gaps in knowledge about the use of fans, which might lead to their inappropriate use.
To determine whether the use of electric fans contributes to, or impedes, heat loss at high ambient temperatures during a heatwave, and to contribute to the evidence base for the public health impacts of heatwaves.
We sought unpublished and published studies that had been published in any language. The review team were able to assess studies reported in English, Chinese, Dutch, French and German; and reports in other languages would have been translated into English as necessary. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Indian biomedical literature (IndMED and MedIND) and databases of Chinese literature (Chinese Journal Net and Digital Periodical of WanFang Data). The most recent electronic searches were done in April 2012. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles and the websites of relevant national and international organisations, and consulted with researchers and policy makers with experience in strategies to manage heatwaves to identify additional studies. The titles and abstracts from each search were checked independently by two review authors. The full text articles that we retrieved were checked independently by at least two authors for their relevance and for references to potentially eligible studies.
Randomised trials and other experimental designs, such as interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies, comparing the use of electric fans with no fans during a heatwave were eligible for this review. The electric fans could be hand-held (battery operated), portable or mounted on the wall or ceiling, or in a window. We sought interventions delivered to anyone for whom a heatwave was likely to have serious adverse health impacts. This would include people of all ages but with a particular focus on some groups (for example older people). Populations from high-, middle- and low-income countries were eligible for the review.
If we had identified eligible studies, they would have been assessed independently by at least two review authors and data would have been extracted on the characteristics of the study, its participants and interventions, as well as the effects on health outcomes. The primary outcomes were mortality, hospital admission and other contacts with healthcare services.
We did not identify any eligible studies despite the extensive searching and correspondence with several experts in this topic area. We identified retrospective, observational studies, usually with a case-control design, that investigated the association between the use of electric fans and health outcomes, including death. The results of these studies were mixed. Some studies found that the use of fans was associated with better health outcomes, others found the reverse.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence we identified does not resolve uncertainties about the health effects of electric fans during heatwaves. Therefore, this review does not support or refute the use of electric fans during a heatwave. People making decisions about electric fans should consider the current state of the evidence base, and they might also wish to make themselves aware of local policy or guidelines when making a choice about whether or not to use or supply electric fans. The main implication of this review is that high quality research is needed to resolve the long standing and ongoing uncertainty about the benefits and harms of using electric fans during a heatwave, for example randomised trials comparing the health effects in people with electric fans to those in people without them.
热浪是突破区域或国家阈值、持续数天的炎热天气事件。在世界某些地区,它们发生的频率可能会增加。2003年8月欧洲的情况就说明了其潜在后果,当时一场热浪估计导致3万多人超额死亡。使用电风扇可能是为了减轻热浪对健康的不利影响。风扇不会降低周围空气的温度,但放在敞开的窗户处时可用于引入室外较凉爽的空气。风扇的目的是通过提高所有正常散热方法的效率,特别是蒸发和对流方法的效率来增加热量散失。然而,应该注意的是,如果这些液体和电解质没有得到足够快地补充,出汗增加会导致脱水和电解质失衡。研究还发现,在风扇使用知识方面存在重要空白,这可能导致其使用不当。
确定在热浪期间环境温度较高时使用电风扇是有助于还是阻碍热量散失,并为热浪对公众健康的影响提供证据基础。
我们检索了以任何语言发表的未发表和已发表的研究。综述团队能够评估以英语、中文、荷兰语、法语和德语报告的研究;必要时,其他语言的报告会被翻译成英语。我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、印度生物医学文献(IndMED和MedIND)以及中国文献数据库(中国期刊网和万方数据数字化期刊)。最近的电子检索于2012年4月进行。我们还检查了相关文章的参考文献列表以及相关国家和国际组织的网站,并咨询了在热浪管理策略方面有经验的研究人员和政策制定者,以识别其他研究。每次检索得到的标题和摘要由两位综述作者独立检查。我们检索到的全文文章由至少两位作者独立检查其相关性以及对潜在合格研究的引用。
随机试验和其他实验设计,如中断时间序列和前后对照研究,比较热浪期间使用电风扇与不使用电风扇的情况,符合本综述的纳入标准。电风扇可以是手持式(电池供电)、便携式的或安装在墙上、天花板上或窗户上的。我们寻求针对任何可能受到热浪严重不利健康影响的人群的干预措施。这将包括所有年龄段的人,但特别关注某些群体(例如老年人)。高收入、中等收入和低收入国家的人群均符合本综述的纳入标准。
如果我们确定了合格的研究,它们将由至少两位综述作者独立评估,并提取关于研究特征、其参与者和干预措施以及对健康结果影响的数据。主要结局是死亡率、住院率以及与医疗服务的其他接触情况。
尽管进行了广泛的检索并与该主题领域的几位专家进行了沟通,但我们未找到任何合格的研究。我们确定了回顾性观察性研究,通常采用病例对照设计,这些研究调查了使用电风扇与健康结果(包括死亡)之间的关联。这些研究的结果不一。一些研究发现使用风扇与更好的健康结果相关,另一些则发现相反的情况。
我们确定的证据并未解决关于热浪期间电风扇对健康影响的不确定性。因此,本综述既不支持也不反驳热浪期间使用电风扇。做出关于电风扇决策的人应考虑现有证据的状况,并且在决定是否使用或提供电风扇时,他们可能也希望了解当地政策或指南。本综述的主要意义在于,需要高质量的研究来解决长期存在且持续的关于热浪期间使用电风扇的利弊的不确定性,例如比较使用电风扇的人与不使用电风扇的人的健康影响的随机试验。