• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放获取与订阅模式:比较物理治疗与康复领域期刊的影响力

Open access vs. subscription: comparing the impact of journals in physical therapy and rehabilitation.

作者信息

Ozyigit Elif, Temel Mustafa Hüseyin, Bağcıer Fatih

机构信息

University of Health Sciences Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye.

University of Health Sciences Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04038-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-04038-8
PMID:40788447
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open access (OA) and subscription-based (SB) journals are key models in academic publishing. OA journals focus on accessibility, while SB journals often emphasize subscription revenue, leading to variations in metrics such as impact factor and citation performance.

AIM

To compare metrics of OA and SB physical therapy and rehabilitation journals using Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJCR).

METHODS

The study analyzed 266 journals, including 92 OA and 174 SB journals. Metrics such as impact factor, H-index, Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), total citations, citations-to-documents ratio, quartile rankings, and article processing charges (APCs) were examined.

RESULTS

SB journals showed significantly higher H-index values (p < 0.001). Higher APCs in OA journals were strongly correlated with higher impact factors (r = 0.703, p < 0.001), SJR (r = 0.727, p < 0.001), total citations (r = 0.586, p < 0.001), and H-index (r = 0.520, p < 0.001). Quartile rankings indicated better performance for OA journals (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While SB journals exhibited higher H-index values, OA journals performed similarly in other metrics. The correlation between higher APCs and improved performance in OA journals underscores the role of financial investment. Both models are crucial for disseminating research in physical therapy and rehabilitation, highlighting the importance of editorial standards and rigorous peer review.

摘要

背景

开放获取(OA)期刊和基于订阅(SB)的期刊是学术出版的关键模式。OA期刊注重可获取性,而SB期刊通常强调订阅收入,这导致诸如影响因子和引用表现等指标存在差异。

目的

使用Scimago期刊与国家排名(SJCR)比较OA和SB物理治疗与康复期刊的指标。

方法

该研究分析了266种期刊,包括92种OA期刊和174种SB期刊。研究了诸如影响因子、H指数、Scimago期刊排名(SJR)、总引用次数、文献引用率、四分位数排名和文章处理费(APC)等指标。

结果

SB期刊显示出显著更高的H指数值(p < 0.001)。OA期刊中较高的APC与较高的影响因子(r = 0.703,p < 0.001)、SJR(r = 0.727,p < 0.001)、总引用次数(r = 0.586,p < 0.001)和H指数(r = 0.520,p < 0.001)密切相关。四分位数排名表明OA期刊表现更好(p < 0.05)。

结论

虽然SB期刊的H指数值较高,但OA期刊在其他指标上表现相似。OA期刊中较高的APC与更好的表现之间的相关性强调了资金投入所起的作用。这两种模式对于传播物理治疗与康复领域的研究都至关重要,凸显了编辑标准和严格同行评审的重要性。

相似文献

1
Open access vs. subscription: comparing the impact of journals in physical therapy and rehabilitation.开放获取与订阅模式:比较物理治疗与康复领域期刊的影响力
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04038-8.
2
Variability in article processing charges of open-access publishing across medical specialties.医学各专业开放获取出版的文章处理费的差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0320684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320684. eCollection 2025.
3
Open Access Publishing Metrics, Cost, and Impact in Health Professions Education Journals.开放获取出版计量学、成本及对健康职业教育期刊的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439932. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39932.
4
Metrics of activity in social networks are correlated with traditional metrics of scientific impact in endocrinology journals.社交网络中的活跃度指标与内分泌学期刊中传统的科学影响力指标相关。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):2437-2440. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
Evolution of journal rankings in orthopedics and sports medicine (2000-2024) : A SCImago-based bibliometric analysis.骨科与运动医学领域期刊排名的演变(2000 - 2024):基于Scimago的文献计量分析
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Oct;54(10):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04683-y. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
6
Resilience and Recalibration of Bibliometric Indicators in Neurosciences and Neuropharmacology Journals After COVID-19: A Longitudinal Rate of Change Analysis Using Mixed-Effects Models.COVID-19 后神经科学与神经药理学杂志文献计量指标的弹性与重新校准:使用混合效应模型的纵向变化率分析
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.2174/011570159X384613250702110845.
7
Analysis of Article Processing Charges of Orthopaedic Journals in the United States.美国骨科期刊论文处理费分析
J Orthop Res. 2025 Aug;43(8):1501-1507. doi: 10.1002/jor.26097. Epub 2025 May 10.
8
Social networks and traditional metrics of impact in pulmonary medicine journals: a correlation study.社交网络与肺医学期刊的传统影响力指标:一项相关性研究。
Adv Respir Med. 2019;87(6):209-213. doi: 10.5603/ARM.2019.0058.
9
A Comparative Analysis of Otolaryngology Journal Characteristics and Metrics Across World Bank Income Groups.世界银行收入组间耳鼻喉科期刊特征与指标的比较分析
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4001-4005. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04762-0. Epub 2024 May 31.
10
Changing trends in otorhinolaryngology publishing.耳鼻咽喉科学出版领域的变化趋势
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2020 Feb;40(1):1-4. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2192. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact factor, first quartile, CiteScore and other metrics.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2024 Sep;105(9):303-304. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism.h指数:了解其预测因素、意义及批评意见。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Nov;12(11):2531-2537. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1613_23. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Maximizing Access and Minimizing Barriers to Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Open Access and Health Equity.最大限度地扩大中低收入国家的研究机会,减少其面临的障碍:开放获取与健康公平。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2024 Feb;114(2):83-85. doi: 10.1007/s00223-023-01151-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Validation of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8.土耳其慢性疼痛接纳问卷-8的验证
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 12;69(2):216-221. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.10857. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Are open access article processing charges affordable for otolaryngologists in low-income and middle-income countries?在低收入和中等收入国家,耳鼻喉科医生能够负担得起开放获取文章处理费吗?
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;31(3):202-207. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000892. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
6
Open access publishing - noble intention, flawed reality.开放获取出版——初衷美好,现实却有缺陷。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115592. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
7
Open access journals are as likely to be referenced by the Orthopaedic literature, despite having a lower impact factor than subscription-based journals.尽管开放获取期刊的影响因子低于订阅型期刊,但骨科文献引用它们的可能性是一样的。
SICOT J. 2021;7:64. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021062. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Article Processing Charge Waiver Policies as a Barrier to Oncology Scholarship in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries.文章处理费豁免政策成为低收入和中低收入国家肿瘤学学术研究的障碍。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Aug;7:1413-1417. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00143.
9
The Impact of Open Access Status on Journal Indexes of Radiology Journals.开放获取状态对放射学期刊期刊索引的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):736-739. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21215. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.康复领域的掠夺性开放获取
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.