Sırrı Bayram, Elbasan Bülent
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Mus Alparslan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mus, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
J Mot Behav. 2025;57(6):655-663. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2025.2536841. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
Upper extremity Selective Voluntary Motor Control (SVMC) is a key factor influencing upper extremity functions in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), but differences in SVMC of the upper extremity between unilateral and bilateral CP and its association with trunk control and balance remain unclear. This study aims to examine differences in upper extremity SVMC and its association with trunk control and balance in 58 children (31 unilateral, 27 bilateral) with spastic CP. SVMC, balance, and trunk control were assessed using the Selective Control of Upper Extremity Scale (SCUES). Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), and the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), respectively. No significant difference in SCUES scores was found between unilateral and bilateral CP ( > 0.05). SCUES scores correlated with TCMS in both types ( < 0.05), with a stronger correlation in bilateral CP (unilateral rho = 0.38, bilateral rho = 0.87). PBS correlated with SCUES only in bilateral cases ( < 0.01, rho = 0.88). In conclusion, impaired upper extremity SVMC is common in spastic CP and more linked to trunk control and balance in bilateral than unilateral cases. Addressing this difference may guide the development of tailored interventions for both types.
上肢选择性随意运动控制(SVMC)是影响脑瘫(CP)儿童上肢功能的关键因素,但单侧和双侧CP患儿上肢SVMC的差异及其与躯干控制和平衡的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨58例痉挛型CP患儿(31例单侧,27例双侧)上肢SVMC的差异及其与躯干控制和平衡的关系。分别使用上肢选择性控制量表(SCUES)、儿科平衡量表(PBS)和躯干控制测量量表(TCMS)评估SVMC、平衡和躯干控制。单侧和双侧CP患儿的SCUES评分无显著差异(>0.05)。两种类型的SCUES评分均与TCMS相关(<0.05),双侧CP的相关性更强(单侧rho=0.38,双侧rho=0.87)。PBS仅在双侧病例中与SCUES相关(<0.01,rho=0.88)。总之,上肢SVMC受损在痉挛型CP中很常见,且与双侧病例的躯干控制和平衡的关联比单侧病例更强。认识到这种差异可能会指导针对两种类型的量身定制干预措施的制定。