Prosty Connor, Noutsios Dean, Dubé Laurie-Rose, Baden Rachel, Davar Kusha, Freling Sarah, Bhuket Taft, Yee Hal F, Spellberg Brad, McDonald Emily G, Lee Todd C
Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3832.
International guidelines recommend 5 to 7 days of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the evidence for this recommendation has not been reassessed recently.
To determine whether current evidence continues to support the recommended 5 to 7 days of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Searches were performed of the Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to September 25, 2024. The search query included the keywords gastrointestinal bleeding and prophylactic antibiotics.
Included RCTs compared longer durations of antibiotic prophylaxis to shorter durations (or 0 days) in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Observational and pediatric studies, gray literature, comparisons of systemic antibiotics, studies not reporting mortality or early rebleed, and studies of nonsystemic antibiotics were excluded.
Data were extracted in duplicate by independent reviewers. Study quality was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data were pooled by random-effects bayesian meta-analyses using a noninformative prior for the effect and a weakly informative prior for heterogeneity. To account for therapeutic advancements, a post hoc subgroup analysis was performed for studies published after 2004.
The primary outcome was all-cause mortality with a prespecified 5% noninferiority margin on the risk difference (RD) scale. Early rebleed and bacterial infections were secondary outcomes.
The analysis included 14 RCTs totaling 1322 participants (mean age range, 41.5 to 62.0 years; 981 male [74.2%] individuals), of whom 1202 (90.9%) had a variceal source of bleeding. Study quality was low to moderate, bacterial infections were heterogeneously defined, and no studies reported adverse events. Two RCTs compared longer (5-7 days) to shorter (2-3 days) durations and 12 RCTs compared any prophylaxis (1-10 days) to none. Shorter durations (including none) had a 97.3% probability of noninferiority for all-cause mortality (RD, 0.9%; 95% credible interval [95% CrI], -2.6 to 4.9). Shorter durations had a 73.8% probability of noninferiority for early rebleeding (RD, 2.9%; 95% CrI, -4.2 to 10.0) but were associated with more study-defined bacterial infections (RD, 15.2%; 95% CrI, 5.0 to 25.9). The probabilities of noninferiority of shorter durations for all 3 outcomes were higher in studies published after 2004.
The findings of this systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis do not support the purported mortality benefit driving guideline recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeds. Although prophylaxis reduced reported infections, methodological concerns regarding infection definitions introduced high risk of bias. Higher-quality RCTs are needed to determine the benefit and optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in the modern era of advanced interventions. Until these studies are available, clinicians should be aware that the current guideline recommendations are not based on high-quality evidence.
国际指南推荐对肝硬化和上消化道出血患者进行5至7天的抗生素预防性治疗。然而,这一推荐的证据最近尚未重新评估。
确定当前证据是否继续支持对肝硬化和上消化道出血患者推荐的5至7天抗生素预防性治疗。
对Embase、MEDLINE和CENTRAL数据库进行检索,查找从数据库建立至2024年9月25日的随机临床试验(RCT)。检索词包括关键词“胃肠道出血”和“预防性抗生素”。
纳入的RCT比较了肝硬化和上消化道出血患者中较长疗程的抗生素预防性治疗与较短疗程(或0天)的治疗效果。排除观察性研究和儿科研究、灰色文献、全身性抗生素的比较研究、未报告死亡率或早期再出血的研究以及非全身性抗生素的研究。
由独立评审员重复提取数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具重复评估研究质量。采用随机效应贝叶斯荟萃分析合并数据,对效应采用非信息先验,对异质性采用弱信息先验。为了考虑治疗进展,对2004年后发表的研究进行了事后亚组分析。
主要结局是全因死亡率,在风险差(RD)量表上预先设定非劣效性边际为5%。早期再出血和细菌感染是次要结局。
分析纳入了14项RCT,共1322名参与者(平均年龄范围为41.5至62.0岁;981名男性[74.2%]),其中1202名(90.9%)有静脉曲张出血源。研究质量为低到中等,细菌感染的定义不统一,且没有研究报告不良事件。两项RCT比较了较长疗程(5 - 7天)与较短疗程(2 - 3天),12项RCT比较了任何预防性治疗(1 - 10天)与不进行预防性治疗。较短疗程(包括不进行预防性治疗)在全因死亡率方面非劣效的概率为97.3%(RD,0.9%;95%可信区间[95% CrI], -2.6至4.9)。较短疗程在早期再出血方面非劣效的概率为73.8%(RD,2.9%;95% CrI, -4.2至10.0),但与更多研究定义的细菌感染相关(RD,15.2%;95% CrI,5.0至25.9)。2004年后发表的研究中,较短疗程在所有3个结局方面非劣效的概率更高。
这项系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析的结果不支持为肝硬化和上消化道出血患者的抗生素预防性治疗提供指南推荐的所谓死亡率获益。尽管预防性治疗减少了报告的感染,但关于感染定义的方法学问题导致了较高的偏倚风险。在先进干预的现代时代,需要更高质量的RCT来确定抗生素预防性治疗的获益和最佳疗程。在这些研究可用之前,临床医生应意识到当前的指南推荐并非基于高质量证据。