Suppr超能文献

腹膜外与经腹腹腔镜囊肿切除术:单中心回顾性队列研究中的优化手术技术及长期结局

Extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic cystectomy: optimized surgical techniques and long-term outcomes in a single-center retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Zhu Guanqun, He Yuxuan, Wang Shicheng, Huang Jiao, Zhang Rui, Zhang Zongliang, Zhao Kai, Yin Xinbao, Yang Xiaokun, Jiang Zaiqing, Jiang Guoyi, Bae Woong Jin, Wang Ke

机构信息

Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, Shangdong, China.

Catholic Integrative Medicine Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;23(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03966-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the long-term oncologic outcomes and perioperative performance of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLRC) in patients with bladder cancer (BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study included 298 BC patients who underwent ELRC (n = 202) or TLRC (n = 96) between January 2020 and January 2025. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints were operative time, estimated blood loss, gastrointestinal recovery, and perioperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression, and subgroup analysis were used to evaluate outcomes and risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 25.6 months for ELRC and 30.7 months for TLRC. There were no significant differences in projected OS (HR = 0.89, P = 0.562), CSS (HR = 0.87, P = 0.492), PFS (HR = 1.09, P = 0.693), or RFS (HR = 1.16, P = 0.453) between the two groups. ELRC was associated with significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, faster gastrointestinal recovery, and lower incidence of ileus and infections (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified pathological T stage and ASA score as independent predictors of OS. Subgroup analysis showed no significant impact of urinary diversion type or tumor stage on survival outcomes between the two approaches.

CONCLUSION

LRC may be a feasible alternative to TLRC, with potential advantages in perioperative recovery and reduced postoperative complications, while demonstrating comparable oncologic outcomes. Prospective multicenter studies with longer-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

评估并比较腹膜外腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(ELRC)与经腹腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(TLRC)治疗膀胱癌(BC)患者的长期肿瘤学结局及围手术期表现。

患者与方法

这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了2020年1月至2025年1月期间接受ELRC(n = 202)或TLRC(n = 96)的298例BC患者。主要终点包括总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。次要终点为手术时间、估计失血量、胃肠道恢复情况及围手术期并发症。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、Cox回归和亚组分析来评估结局及危险因素。

结果

ELRC组的平均随访时间为25.6个月,TLRC组为30.7个月。两组在预计OS(风险比[HR]=0.89,P = 0.562)、CSS(HR = 0.87,P = 0.492)、PFS(HR = 1.09,P = 0.693)或RFS(HR = 1.16,P = 0.453)方面无显著差异。ELRC与显著更短的手术时间、更少的失血量、更快的胃肠道恢复以及更低的肠梗阻和感染发生率相关(所有P<0.05)。多变量分析确定病理T分期和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分是OS的独立预测因素。亚组分析显示,两种手术方式中尿流改道类型或肿瘤分期对生存结局无显著影响。

结论

LRC可能是TLRC的一种可行替代方案,在围手术期恢复方面具有潜在优势,术后并发症减少,同时显示出相当的肿瘤学结局。有必要进行长期随访的前瞻性多中心研究以证实这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验