Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England.
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2092-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is being performed with increasing frequency, but it is unclear whether total intracorporeal surgery improves recovery compared with open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
To compare recovery and morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction vs open radical cystectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial of patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer recruited at 9 sites in the UK, from March 2017-March 2020. Follow-up was conducted at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months, with final follow-up on September 23, 2021.
Participants were randomized to receive robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction (n = 169) or open radical cystectomy (n = 169).
The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including complications, quality of life, disability, stamina, activity levels, and survival. Analyses were adjusted for the type of diversion and center.
Among 338 randomized participants, 317 underwent radical cystectomy (mean age, 69 years; 67 women [21%]; 107 [34%] received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 282 [89%] underwent ileal conduit reconstruction); the primary outcome was analyzed in 305 (96%). The median number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days of surgery was 82 (IQR, 76-84) for patients undergoing robotic surgery vs 80 (IQR, 72-83) for open surgery (adjusted difference, 2.2 days [95% CI, 0.50-3.85]; P = .01). Thromboembolic complications (1.9% vs 8.3%; difference, -6.5% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.4%]) and wound complications (5.6% vs 16.0%; difference, -11.7% [95% CI, -18.6% to -4.6%]) were less common with robotic surgery than open surgery. Participants undergoing open surgery reported worse quality of life vs robotic surgery at 5 weeks (difference in mean European Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 5-Level instrument scores, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03]; P = .003) and greater disability at 5 weeks (difference in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 scores, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.15-0.73]; P = .003) and at 12 weeks (difference in WHODAS 2.0 scores, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.09-0.68]; P = .01); the differences were not significant after 12 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer recurrence (29/161 [18%] vs 25/156 [16%] after robotic and open surgery, respectively) and overall mortality (23/161 [14.3%] vs 23/156 [14.7%]), respectively) at median follow-up of 18.4 months (IQR, 12.8-21.1).
Among patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, treatment with robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy resulted in a statistically significant increase in days alive and out of the hospital over 90 days. However, the clinical importance of these findings remains uncertain.
ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN13680280; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.
重要性:机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的应用频率越来越高,但尚不清楚与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相比,全腔内手术是否能改善膀胱癌患者的恢复情况。
目的:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术伴腔内重建与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的恢复和发病率。
设计、设置和参与者:2017 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月,在英国的 9 个地点招募了非转移性膀胱癌患者,进行了一项随机临床试验。在 90 天、6 个月和 12 个月时进行随访,最终随访时间为 2021 年 9 月 23 日。
干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术伴腔内重建(n=169)或开放性根治性膀胱切除术(n=169)。
主要结果和措施:主要结果是手术 90 天内存活和出院的天数。共有 20 项次要结果,包括并发症、生活质量、残疾、耐力、活动水平和生存。分析调整了分流类型和中心因素。
结果:在 338 名随机参与者中,317 名接受了根治性膀胱切除术(平均年龄 69 岁;67 名女性[21%];107 名[34%]接受新辅助化疗;282 名[89%]接受回肠造口术);主要结果在 305 名(96%)患者中进行了分析。机器人手术患者在手术 90 天内存活和出院的中位数天数为 82(IQR,76-84),而开放性手术患者为 80(IQR,72-83)(调整差异,2.2 天[95%CI,0.50-3.85];P=0.01)。血栓栓塞并发症(1.9%比 8.3%;差异,-6.5%[95%CI,-11.4%至-1.4%])和伤口并发症(5.6%比 16.0%;差异,-11.7%[95%CI,-18.6%至-4.6%])在机器人手术中比开放性手术更为少见。与机器人手术相比,接受开放性手术的患者在 5 周时报告的生活质量更差(欧洲生活质量 5 维问卷 5 级仪器评分差异,-0.07[95%CI,-0.11 至 -0.03];P=0.003),在 5 周和 12 周时(差异,0.48[95%CI,0.15-0.73];P=0.003)和 12 周时(差异,0.38[95%CI,0.09-0.68];P=0.01)的残疾程度更大;12 周后差异不显著。在中位随访 18.4 个月(IQR,12.8-21.1)时,两组在癌症复发(机器人组 29/161 [18%],开放性组 25/156 [16%])和总死亡率(机器人组 23/161 [14.3%],开放性组 23/156 [14.7%])方面无统计学差异。
结论和相关性:在接受根治性膀胱切除术的非转移性膀胱癌患者中,与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相比,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合腔内尿流改道可显著增加术后 90 天内的存活和出院天数。然而,这些发现的临床重要性仍不确定。
试验注册:ISRCTN 标识符:ISRCTN85141625;ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03049410。