• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖成年人的减肥手术决策:一项扎根理论研究。

Bariatric surgery decision-making of adults with obesity: a grounded theory study.

作者信息

Xu Yihong, Li Wen, Zhu Liping, Li Yunxia, Wang Jianan, Zhang Xiaoxiao, Ding Shanni, Wu Mizhi, Pan Hongying, Yu Weihua, Chen Jionghuang

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3 East Qingchun Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):2725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24035-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-24035-x
PMID:40790737
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The retention rate of Bariatric Surgery (BS) remains a critical concern, yet the decision-making mechanism among obese individuals considering BS is still unclear. This study aims to identify key stages and core mechanisms in the BS decision-making process.

DESIGN

Qualitative, one-on-one, and focus group in-depth interviews were conducted.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in China from September 2022 to February 2023. Using the Straussian Grounded Theory (SGT) approach, an iterative analysis of the BS decision-making process was performed, ultimately constructing a decision-making mechanism for obese patients opting for BS. Reporting followed the SRQR checklist.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 21 obese individuals scheduled for BS one day before surgery. A theoretical model was developed to describe and explain the BS decision-making process. The study identified five key stages in the decision-making process: Initial Attention, Proactive Information-Seeking, Decision-Making Process, Definitive Surgical Decision, Preparation Phase, and Abandonment, with the Decision-Making Process being the most critical. The study examined the influence of External Environment on Cognitive Decision-Making, focusing on social pressure, social support, and peer support. Additionally, the Cognitive Trade-off Theory for Bariatric Surgery (CTT-BS) was established, incorporating five cognitive-level factors.

CONCLUSION

The identified decision-making stages and cognitive theory provide evidence to clarify the facilitators and barriers to BS motivation retention, offering insights for developing strategies to improve BS retention rates.

摘要

目的

减肥手术(BS)的保留率仍是一个关键问题,但考虑接受减肥手术的肥胖个体的决策机制仍不明确。本研究旨在确定减肥手术决策过程中的关键阶段和核心机制。

设计

进行定性、一对一和焦点小组深入访谈。

方法

于2022年9月至2023年2月在中国进行半结构化访谈。采用施特劳斯扎根理论(SGT)方法,对减肥手术决策过程进行迭代分析,最终构建肥胖患者选择减肥手术的决策机制。报告遵循SRQR清单。

结果

对21名计划在手术前一天接受减肥手术的肥胖个体进行了访谈。开发了一个理论模型来描述和解释减肥手术的决策过程。该研究确定了决策过程中的五个关键阶段:初始关注、主动寻求信息、决策过程、最终手术决策、准备阶段和放弃,其中决策过程最为关键。该研究考察了外部环境对认知决策的影响,重点关注社会压力、社会支持和同伴支持。此外,还建立了减肥手术认知权衡理论(CTT-BS),纳入了五个认知层面的因素。

结论

所确定的决策阶段和认知理论为阐明减肥手术动机保留的促进因素和障碍提供了证据,为制定提高减肥手术保留率的策略提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Bariatric surgery decision-making of adults with obesity: a grounded theory study.肥胖成年人的减肥手术决策:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):2725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24035-x.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
4
What makes a 'good' decision with artificial intelligence? A grounded theory study in paediatric care.如何利用人工智能做出“好”的决策?一项关于儿科护理的扎根理论研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):183-193. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112919.
5
Patient autonomy and metabolic bariatric surgery: an empirical perspective.患者自主权与代谢性减重手术:实证视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 3;26(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01177-6.
6
Between host country and homeland: a grounded theory study on place of dying and death in migrant cancer patients.在侨居国与祖国之间:一项关于移民癌症患者死亡地点和死亡情况的扎根理论研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01821-3.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚青年男女的避孕决策:定性研究结果。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848.
10
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in patients with COVID-19 after bariatric surgery: a multicenter cross-sectional study.肥胖症患者接受减重手术后 COVID-19 患者的性别差异:一项多中心横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;11:1293318. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293318. eCollection 2023.
2
A qualitative analysis of Black men's attitudes toward obesity and bariatric surgery.黑人男性对肥胖和减肥手术态度的定性分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Oct;19(10):1100-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Adolescents' and professionals' experiences of metabolic and bariatric surgery and requirements for preoperative and postoperative support through mHealth: a qualitative study.
青少年和专业人员对代谢和减重手术的体验,以及通过移动医疗在术前和术后获得支持的需求:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 4;12(11):e064893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064893.
4
Self-withdrawal from scheduled bariatric surgery: Qualitative study exploring patient and healthcare provider perspectives.择期减重手术患者自行退出手术:一项探索患者和医疗服务提供者观点的定性研究。
Clin Obes. 2023 Feb;13(1):e12558. doi: 10.1111/cob.12558. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Barriers to metabolic bariatric surgery in adolescents: results of a qualitative study.青少年代谢减重手术障碍:定性研究结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jun;18(6):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
6
Individual-level barriers to bariatric surgery from patient and provider perspectives: A qualitative study.从患者和提供者角度看减重手术的个体障碍:一项定性研究。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt B):429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China.中国肥胖问题的健康政策和公共卫生影响。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jul;9(7):446-461. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00118-2. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Utilisation in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Data from the IFSO Global Registry 2015-2018.有糖尿病和无糖尿病患者的减重代谢手术应用情况:来自国际肥胖与代谢病外科联盟全球注册中心2015 - 2018年的数据
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2391-2400. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05280-6. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10-year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial.代谢手术与 2 型糖尿病患者的常规药物治疗的比较:一项开放标签、单中心、随机对照临床试验的 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 23;397(10271):293-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32649-0.
10
Perceived and Preferred Social Support in Patients Experiencing Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery-a Qualitative Study.减重手术后体重反弹患者感知和偏好的社会支持:一项定性研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):1256-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05128-5. Epub 2020 Nov 17.