• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我希望在给人们开这些药之前,能更经常地告诉他们停药有多难”:对一项关于减少和停用精神科药物的调查的自由文本回复的定性描述性分析

'I Wish It Were More Often Told to People Before They Are Prescribed These Medications How Hard It Is to Get Off Them': A Qualitative Descriptive Analysis of Free-Text Responses to a Survey on Reducing and Stopping Psychiatric Medication.

作者信息

Boland Miriam, Higgins Agnes, Kwak Sookyung, Cadogan Cathal

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70384. doi: 10.1111/hex.70384.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70384
PMID:40790920
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant increases in the prescribing of psychiatric medication in recent years, many uncertainties exist regarding the process of reducing and stopping these medications. A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) study was conducted to identify the top 10 research priorities on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication. As part of the PSP study, an online survey was conducted, which asked respondents to submit their views and experiences of reducing and/or stopping psychiatric medication as free-text comments. This study aimed to conduct a descriptive analysis on these free-text survey responses.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive analysis was undertaken on responses submitted to the online survey, which was disseminated using social media, newsletters and emails. Responses were submitted by three stakeholder groups (i.e., people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication, family members/carers/supporters and healthcare professionals). All survey responses were downloaded, screened and analysed using template analysis. A coding template was iteratively developed using samples of responses and then applied to the responses by the researchers working independently.

RESULTS

In total, 705 responses contained free-text additional comments, of which 483 responses were considered in-scope. Six main themes were identified: (1) experiences of psychiatric medication, (2) challenges to reducing/stopping psychiatric medication, (3) strategies used to reduce/stop psychiatric medication, (4) outcomes of reducing/stopping psychiatric medication, (5) emotional context and (6) areas for improvement.

CONCLUSION

This study identified numerous challenges faced by respondents when discontinuing psychiatric medication, the uncertainty that prevails in terms of the best tapering strategy and the emotional impact of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication. The findings also highlight the importance of support during the discontinuation process, in particular psychosocial supports, and areas that could be targeted to improve the withdrawal process.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

An international Steering Group was established to oversee and guide the PSP study in accordance with the James Lind Alliance guidance and Patient and Public Involvement principles. Patient and public groups were represented on the Steering Group and were among the three key stakeholder groups (i.e., people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medication, family members/carers/supporters and healthcare professionals) engaged with throughout.

摘要

引言

尽管近年来精神科药物的处方量显著增加,但在减少和停用这些药物的过程中仍存在许多不确定性。开展了一项詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目(PSP)研究,以确定减少和停用精神科药物的前10大研究重点。作为PSP研究的一部分,进行了一项在线调查,要求受访者以自由文本评论的形式提交他们减少和/或停用精神科药物的观点和经历。本研究旨在对这些自由文本调查回复进行描述性分析。

方法

对通过社交媒体、时事通讯和电子邮件分发的在线调查所收到的回复进行定性描述性分析。回复由三个利益相关者群体提交(即有服用和/或停用精神科药物亲身经历的人、家庭成员/护理人员/支持者以及医疗保健专业人员)。所有调查回复均被下载、筛选,并使用模板分析法进行分析。使用回复样本迭代开发编码模板,然后由独立工作的研究人员将其应用于回复。

结果

总共705条回复包含自由文本附加评论,其中483条回复被视为有效范围。确定了六个主要主题:(1)精神科药物的使用经历,(2)减少/停用精神科药物的挑战,(3)用于减少/停用精神科药物的策略,(4)减少/停用精神科药物的结果,(5)情感背景,以及(6)改进领域。

结论

本研究确定了受访者在停用精神科药物时面临的众多挑战、最佳减量策略方面普遍存在的不确定性以及服用和/或停用精神科药物的情感影响。研究结果还强调了停药过程中支持的重要性,特别是心理社会支持,以及可针对改进停药过程的领域。

患者或公众贡献

成立了一个国际指导小组,以根据詹姆斯·林德联盟的指导方针和患者及公众参与原则监督和指导PSP研究。患者和公众团体在指导小组中有代表,并且是整个过程中参与的三个关键利益相关者群体之一(即有服用和/或停用精神科药物亲身经历的人、家庭成员/护理人员/支持者以及医疗保健专业人员)。

相似文献

1
'I Wish It Were More Often Told to People Before They Are Prescribed These Medications How Hard It Is to Get Off Them': A Qualitative Descriptive Analysis of Free-Text Responses to a Survey on Reducing and Stopping Psychiatric Medication.“我希望在给人们开这些药之前,能更经常地告诉他们停药有多难”:对一项关于减少和停用精神科药物的调查的自由文本回复的定性描述性分析
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70384. doi: 10.1111/hex.70384.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
8
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
10
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of manipulations to pharmaceutical dosage forms used in psychotropic tapering plans.对用于精神药物减药计划的药物剂型操作的系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jul;91(7):1899-1913. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70082. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
Identifying priorities for future research on reducing and stopping psychiatric medication: results of a James Lind Alliance priority-setting partnership.确定减少和停止精神药物使用的未来研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 5;14(11):e088266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088266.
3
'We need more support and doctors that understand the process of tapering …': A content analysis of free-text responses to a questionnaire on discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use.
“我们需要更多支持,也需要更多理解停药过程的医生……”:一项对长期苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂停药问卷的自由文本回复的内容分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13962. doi: 10.1111/hex.13962.
4
The lived experience of withdrawal from Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: A qualitative interview study.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)类抗抑郁药戒断的真实体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13966. doi: 10.1111/hex.13966.
5
Prescribing and deprescribing guidance for benzodiazepine and benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in adults with depression, anxiety, and insomnia: an international scoping review.苯二氮䓬类药物及苯二氮䓬受体激动剂在患有抑郁症、焦虑症和失眠症的成人中使用的处方及减药指南:一项国际范围综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 13;70:102507. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102507. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Politicians, experts, and patient representatives call for the UK government to reverse the rate of antidepressant prescribing.政治家、专家和患者代表呼吁英国政府扭转抗抑郁药的处方率。
BMJ. 2023 Dec 5;383:2730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2730.
7
Current strategies for tapering psychiatric drugs: Differing recommendations, impractical doses, and other barriers.目前精神药物减量的策略:不同的建议、不切实际的剂量和其他障碍。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Nov;329:115537. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115537. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
8
Mental Health Staff's Perspectives on Tapering of Antipsychotic Medication: A Focus Group Study.精神卫生工作人员对抗精神病药物逐渐减量的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Nov;33(13):1165-1176. doi: 10.1177/10497323231195821. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Long-term consequences of benzodiazepine-induced neurological dysfunction: A survey.苯二氮䓬类药物引起的神经功能障碍的长期后果:一项调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0285584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285584. eCollection 2023.
10
The need for antidepressant withdrawal support services: Recommendations from 708 patients.对抗抑郁药戒断支持服务的需求:708名患者的建议
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Aug;326:115303. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115303. Epub 2023 Jun 22.