• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员使用大语言模型时的伦理意识:一种量表的开发与验证

Ethical Awareness in the Use of Large Language Models: Development and Validation of a Scale for Healthcare Professionals.

作者信息

Asal Maha Gamal Ramadan, Alsenany Samira Ahmed, Badoman Talal Emad Ahmed, El-Sayed Ahmed Abdelwahab Ibrahim

机构信息

Nursing Department, College of Pharmacy and Applied Medical Sciences, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Public Health Department, Faculty of Nursing, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70241. doi: 10.1111/jep.70241.

DOI:10.1111/jep.70241
PMID:40794017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare offers transformative potential but raises significant ethical challenges. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive framework to assess healthcare professionals' ethical awareness of LLMs usage.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a scale designed to evaluate healthcare professionals' ethical awareness regarding the integration of LLMs into clinical practice.

METHODS

This two-phase methodological study was conducted in 2024 across nine healthcare institutions-five in Egypt and four in Saudi Arabia. In Phase I, a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals guided the development of the initial scale and item pool. In Phase II, the psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated using data collected from 658 healthcare professionals. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while internal consistency reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha (α) coefficients and item-total correlation metrics.

RESULTS

An initial pool of 36 items was refined to 21 items across 6 dimensions: data privacy and confidentiality, consent and autonomy, transparency and accountability, bias and equity, safety and professional integrity, and education and sustainability. EFA identified a six-factor structure accounting for 71.5% of the variance. CFA confirmed the scale's structure with strong model fit indices for first-order analysis (CMIN/DF = 1.798, CFI = 0.967, RMSEA = 0.050) and second-order analysis (CMIN/DF = 2.862, CFI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.058). The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (overall Cronbach's α = 0.90; dimensions ranging from 0.780 to 0.964) and achieved satisfactory composite reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Moderate statistically significant inter-factor correlations confirmed the multidimensional nature of the scale.

CONCLUSION

The developed scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing healthcare professionals' ethical awareness in the use of LLMs in healthcare. It provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating and enhancing ethical considerations, promoting the responsible and informed use of LLMs technologies in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

将大语言模型(LLMs)整合到医疗保健领域具有变革潜力,但也带来了重大的伦理挑战。应对这些挑战需要一个全面的框架来评估医疗保健专业人员对LLMs使用的伦理意识。

目的

开发并验证一个量表,旨在评估医疗保健专业人员对将LLMs整合到临床实践中的伦理意识。

方法

这项两阶段的方法学研究于2024年在九个医疗保健机构进行,其中五个在埃及,四个在沙特阿拉伯。在第一阶段,对医疗保健专业人员进行全面的文献综述和半结构化访谈,指导初始量表和项目池的开发。在第二阶段,使用从658名医疗保健专业人员收集的数据评估量表的心理测量特性。通过探索性和验证性因素分析评估结构效度,同时使用克朗巴哈α(α)系数和项目-总分相关指标检查内部一致性可靠性。

结果

最初的36个项目池被提炼为21个项目,涵盖6个维度:数据隐私和保密性、同意和自主权、透明度和问责制、偏差和公平性、安全性和专业诚信,以及教育和可持续性。探索性因素分析确定了一个六因素结构,解释了71.5%的方差。验证性因素分析通过一阶分析(CMIN/DF = 1.798,CFI = 0.967,RMSEA = 0.050)和二阶分析(CMIN/DF = 2.862,CFI = 0.927,RMSEA = 0.058)的强模型拟合指数确认了量表的结构。该量表显示出优异的内部一致性(总体克朗巴哈α = 0.90;各维度范围从0.780到0.964),并实现了令人满意的组合可靠性、收敛效度和区分效度。适度的具有统计学意义的因素间相关性证实了该量表的多维性质。

结论

所开发的量表是评估医疗保健专业人员在医疗保健中使用LLMs时伦理意识的有效且可靠的工具。它为评估和加强伦理考量提供了一个全面的框架,促进在临床实践中负责任且明智地使用LLMs技术。

相似文献

1
Ethical Awareness in the Use of Large Language Models: Development and Validation of a Scale for Healthcare Professionals.医疗专业人员使用大语言模型时的伦理意识:一种量表的开发与验证
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70241. doi: 10.1111/jep.70241.
2
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
4
Measuring Managerial, Collegial, and Organizational Aspects Associated With Digital Health Competence in Healthcare Professionals: Validation of the Chinese Version of the DigiComInf Instrument.衡量医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力相关的管理、同事关系和组织方面:DigiComInf工具中文版的验证
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 16;2025:8854459. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8854459. eCollection 2025.
5
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
6
Adapting organizational culture scale into healthcare professional education: a scale validity and reliability analysis.将组织文化量表应用于医疗专业教育:量表效度与信度分析
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Jul 15;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12960-025-01006-2.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Develop and Psychometric Testing an Instrument to Evaluate the Management of Digital Competence Sharing in Healthcare.开发并进行心理测量测试一种用于评估医疗保健中数字能力共享管理的工具。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 3;2025:9906301. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9906301. eCollection 2025.
9
Factorial structure, validity, and gender invariance of the UCLA-R loneliness scale in ecuadorian adolescents.厄瓜多尔青少年中加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表的因子结构、效度及性别不变性
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 4;20(8):e0328163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328163. eCollection 2025.
10
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the training needs assessment for critical care nurses.重症监护护士培训需求评估波斯语版本的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07657-y.