Suppr超能文献

在一项随机交叉人体模型研究中面对面与右后直立位插管的比较疗效

Comparative Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Right-Rear Upright Intubation in a Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

作者信息

Tseng Cheng-Wei, Wen Chung-Shiung, Yu Sheng-Han, Su Yung-Cheng, Li Shu-Sheng, Chen Hsin-Ling, Hung Tzu-Yao

机构信息

Taipei City Hospital, Zhong-Xing Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Chiayi Christian Hospital, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency, Chiayi County, Taiwan.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 10;26(4):1086-1094. doi: 10.5811/westjem.39983.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Upright intubation is essential for managing difficult airways but can be challenging, especially for less experienced clinicians. Face-to-face intubation may lower first-pass success rates due to unfamiliar orientation. New videolaryngoscope devices have the potential to improve intubation success. We aimed to compare first-pass success rates, intubation duration, and glottic view between the right-rear and face-to-face approaches, using channeled videolaryngoscope, hyperangulated videolaryngoscope, and video stylet for upright intubation.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-over manikin simulation study involving 30 participants-19 attending physicians, six residents, and five nurse practitioners-to compare the efficacy of these devices to a standard Macintosh videolaryngoscope, using both right-rear and face-to-face approaches.

RESULTS

We used Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios for the following variables: first-pass success rate; intubation time; glottic view quality (Cormack-Lehane grade [C-L]); and percentage of glottis opening score (POGO]. The right-rear approach demonstrated a substantial improvement in first-pass success rates compared to face-to-face, with rates of 93% vs 78% and a hazard ratio of 2.10 (95% confidence interval 1.58-2.80). Additionally, both the video stylet and channeled videolaryngoscope techniques further optimized first-pass success rates and enhanced glottic visualization, achieving a CL grade I view and POGO scores of 100%, even in the inverted face-to-face orientation. These devices outperformed the standard Macintosh and hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes.

CONCLUSION

The right-rear approach was associated with higher first-pass success rates and provided a more familiar orientation for operators during upright intubation. Video stylets and channeled videolaryngoscopes also contributed to improved success rates, shorter intubation times, and better glottic visualization.

摘要

引言

直立位插管对于处理困难气道至关重要,但具有挑战性,尤其是对于经验较少的临床医生。面对面插管由于方向不熟悉可能会降低首次通过成功率。新型视频喉镜设备有可能提高插管成功率。我们旨在使用带通道视频喉镜、超广角视频喉镜和视频探条进行直立位插管,比较右后方和面对面两种方法的首次通过成功率、插管持续时间和声门视野。

方法

我们进行了一项交叉模拟人研究,纳入30名参与者,其中包括19名主治医师、6名住院医师和5名执业护士,使用右后方和面对面两种方法,比较这些设备与标准麦金托什喉镜的效果。

结果

我们使用Cox回归分析计算以下变量的风险比:首次通过成功率;插管时间;声门视野质量(科马克-莱哈尼分级[C-L])和声门开口评分百分比(POGO)。与面对面方法相比,右后方方法的首次通过成功率有显著提高,分别为93%和78%,风险比为2.10(95%置信区间1.58-2.80)。此外,视频探条和带通道视频喉镜技术进一步优化了首次通过成功率并增强了声门可视化,即使在倒置的面对面方向也能实现C-L I级视野和100% 的POGO评分。这些设备优于标准麦金托什喉镜和超广角视频喉镜。

结论

右后方方法与更高的首次通过成功率相关,并且在直立位插管期间为操作者提供了更熟悉的方向。视频探条和带通道视频喉镜也有助于提高成功率、缩短插管时间并改善声门可视化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efaa/12342571/e743f0f6e5d9/wjem-26-1086-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Face-to-Face and Right-Rear Upright Intubation in a Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 10;26(4):1086-1094. doi: 10.5811/westjem.39983.
2
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
4
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
5
Hyperangulated video laryngoscopy in the emergency department: An analysis of errors and factors leading to prolonged apnea time.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;95:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.026. Epub 2025 May 19.
8
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 24;5(5):CD011413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(4):545-557. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2281363. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Video-stylet vs. channeled hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: Efficacy in simulated Ludwig's angina randomized cadaver trial.
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Feb;76:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
3
A comprehensive review of difficult airway management strategies for patient safety.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Oct;18(4):331-339. doi: 10.17085/apm.23123. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
5
The impact of head and neck radiation on airway management: a retrospective data review.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;69(12):1562-1564. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02331-z. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.
7
Comparison of supine and upright face-to-face cadaver intubation.
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;56:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.029. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Effectiveness of intubation devices in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1055-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.041. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验