Sanchez-Reyes Josefa Maria, Parraga-Leo Antonio, Sebastian-Leon Patricia, Vidal Maria Del Carmen, Marti-Garcia Diana, Spath Katharina, Sanchez-Ribas Imma, Sanz Francisco Jose, Pellicer Nuria, Remohi Jose, Wells Dagan, Pellicer Antonio, Diaz-Gimeno Patricia
IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Hum Reprod. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf156.
Can the disrupted window of implantation (WOI) be stratified according to transcriptomic patterns associated with reproductive success in IVF patients undergoing HRT?
There are four transcriptomic patterns independent of endometrial timing associated with a gradient of reproductive prognosis underlying different molecular pathomechanisms.
A molecular heterogeneous profile independent of endometrial timing has been discovered as a cause of implantation failure that disrupt the endometrial transcriptome in the mid-secretory phase. However, the molecular heterogeneous patterns underlying the disruption remain poorly identify and understood. Characterizing the molecular heterogeneity of this endometrial disruption is crucial to develop personalized and more accurate diagnostic tools for preventive medicine, particularly for patients with a high risk of endometrial failure.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this multicenter prospective study, 195 IVF patients undergoing HRT with endometrial biopsy collection, during mid-secretory phase for endometrial progression evaluation, were recruited between January 2019 and August 2022. Out of 195 patients, 131 were finally included in the following analysis.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Endometrial biopsies were processed for whole endometrial transcriptome analysis using RNA-Sequencing. To identify disruptions in the WOI, the transcriptomic variation due to cyclic endometrial tissue changes was removed. Out of 195 biopsies sequenced, 131 were derived from patients that met the clinical criteria to be classified as implantation failure group (≥3 implantation failures, n = 32) or control group (<3 implantation failures, n = 99). An artificial intelligence (AI) model, based on two supervised learning algorithms: support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (kNN), was performed with 131 patients that were randomly allocated to training (n = 105) and test (n = 26) sets for biomarker signature discovery and assessment of predictive performance, respectively. The reproductive outcomes of the single embryo transfer immediately after biopsy collection were analyzed. Differential expression and functional analyses were performed to characterize molecular profiles. Finally, a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was used to corroborate the differential expression of six potential biomarkers.
With the dichotomous clinical classification of poor or good reproductive prognosis, there was no transcriptomic distinction between patients with a history of implantation failures during HRT endometrial preparation. Alternatively, using an AI model to stratify IVF patients based on the probability of endometrial disruption revealed molecular and clinical differences between patterns. Patients were stratified into four reproductive prognosis-related profiles: p1 (n = 24), p2 (n = 14), c2 (n = 32) and c1 (n = 61). The highest pregnancy rate (PR) was associated with c1 (91%) and the highest ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was associated with c2 (78%), linking these profiles to good reproductive prognoses. On the other hand, p1 had the highest biochemical miscarriage rate (43%) while p2 had the highest clinical miscarriage rate (43%). Notably, both p1 and p2 were related to lower PR and OPR, supporting that these profiles were associated with poor prognoses. Regarding the functional characterization in the poor prognosis profiles that were linked to miscarriages, p1 was associated with an excessive immune response against the embryo during early pregnancy stages, while p2 was initially immune-tolerant but rejected the fetus in later stages due to the lack of metabolic response.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the heterogeneous character of the disrupted WOI and the limited sample size of the different stratified groups, the AI model has limited population inference. However, our significant promising findings provide strong leads for further clinical studies with larger sample sizes.
This new transcriptomic taxonomy associated with distinct reproductive outcomes provides clues to design new and more accurate evaluation tools for endometrial-factor infertility. Furthermore, it enables tailoring therapeutic strategies to apply a personalized medicine to each patient suffering from endometrial-factor infertility, improving their odds of getting pregnant.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by the IVI Foundation (1706-FIVI-048-PD); Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund "A way to make Europe" (PI19/00537 [P.D.-G.]) as well as Instituto Carlos III (ISCIII) through project (PI23/00806 [P.D.-G.]) and co-funded by European Union. Patricia Diaz-Gimeno is supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the Miguel Servet program (CP20/00118) co-funded by the European Union. Patricia Sebastian-Leon and Francisco Jose Sanz are funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the Sara Borrell postdoctoral program (CD21/00132 [P.S.-L.] and CD23/00032 [F.J.S.]) co-financed by the European Union. Josefa Maria Sanchez-Reyes was supported by a predoctoral fellowship program of the Generalitat Valenciana (ACIF/2018/072 and BEFPI/2020/028). Antonio Parraga-Leo (FPU18/01777) and Diana Marti-Garcia (FPU19/03247) were supported by predoctoral fellowship programs of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
对于接受激素替代疗法(HRT)的体外受精(IVF)患者,能否根据与生殖成功相关的转录组模式对植入窗(WOI)紊乱进行分层?
存在四种独立于子宫内膜时间的转录组模式,它们与不同分子病理机制下的生殖预后梯度相关。
已发现一种独立于子宫内膜时间的分子异质性特征是植入失败的原因,它会在分泌中期破坏子宫内膜转录组。然而,这种破坏背后的分子异质性模式仍难以识别和理解。表征这种子宫内膜破坏的分子异质性对于开发个性化且更准确的预防医学诊断工具至关重要,特别是对于子宫内膜失败风险高的患者。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:在这项多中心前瞻性研究中,2019年1月至2022年8月期间招募了195名接受HRT并进行子宫内膜活检的IVF患者,在分泌中期进行子宫内膜活检以评估子宫内膜进展情况。195名患者中,131名最终纳入以下分析。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:对子宫内膜活检组织进行处理,使用RNA测序进行全子宫内膜转录组分析。为了识别WOI中的破坏,去除了由于周期性子宫内膜组织变化引起的转录组变异。在195份测序的活检样本中,131份来自符合临床标准被分类为植入失败组(≥3次植入失败,n = 32)或对照组(<3次植入失败,n = 99)的患者。基于支持向量机(SVM)和k近邻(kNN)两种监督学习算法构建人工智能(AI)模型,对131名患者进行分析,这些患者被随机分配到训练集(n = 105)和测试集(n = 26),分别用于发现生物标志物特征和评估预测性能。分析活检采集后立即进行的单胚胎移植的生殖结局。进行差异表达和功能分析以表征分子特征。最后,使用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测来证实六种潜在生物标志物的差异表达。
根据生殖预后差或好的二分临床分类,在HRT子宫内膜准备期间有植入失败史的患者之间没有转录组学差异。相反,使用AI模型根据子宫内膜破坏的概率对IVF患者进行分层,揭示了不同模式之间的分子和临床差异。患者被分为四种与生殖预后相关的特征组:p1(n = 24)、p2(n = 14)、c2(n = 32)和c1(n = 61)。最高妊娠率(PR)与c1组相关(91%),最高持续妊娠率(OPR)与c2组相关(7%),这些特征组与良好的生殖预后相关。另一方面,p1组生化流产率最高(43%),而p2组临床流产率最高(43%)。值得注意的是,p1和p2组的PR和OPR均较低,表明这些特征组与不良预后相关。关于与流产相关的不良预后特征组的功能表征,p1组与妊娠早期对胚胎的过度免疫反应相关,而p2组最初具有免疫耐受性,但后期由于缺乏代谢反应而排斥胎儿。
局限性、谨慎原因:由于WOI紊乱的异质性以及不同分层组样本量有限,AI模型的总体推断能力有限。然而,我们有前景的显著发现为进一步的大样本临床研究提供了有力线索。
这种与不同生殖结局相关的新转录组分类法为设计新的、更准确的子宫内膜因素不孕症评估工具提供了线索。此外,它能够调整治疗策略,为每位患有子宫内膜因素不孕症的患者应用个性化药物,提高其怀孕几率。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由IVI基金会(1706 - FIVI - 048 - PD)、卡洛斯三世健康研究所(ISCIII)资助,并由欧洲区域发展基金“通向欧洲之路”(PI19/0053([P.D. - G.])共同资助,以及卡洛斯三世研究所(ISCIII)通过项目(PI23/00806([P.D. - G.])并由欧盟共同资助。帕特里夏·迪亚斯 - 希门诺得到卡洛斯三世健康研究所(ISCIII)通过米格尔·塞尔维特计划(CP20/00118)的支持,该计划由欧盟共同资助。帕特里夏·塞巴斯蒂安 - 莱昂和弗朗西斯科·何塞·桑斯由卡洛斯三世健康研究所(ISCIII)通过萨拉·博雷尔博士后计划(CD21/00132([P.S. - L.])和CD23/00032([F.J.S.])资助,由欧盟共同资助。何塞法·玛丽亚·桑切斯 - 雷耶斯得到巴伦西亚大区博士前奖学金计划(ACIF/2018/072和BEFPI/2020/028)的支持。安东尼奥·帕拉加 - 莱奥(FPU18/01777)和戴安娜·马蒂 - 加西亚(FPU19/03247)得到西班牙科学、创新和大学部博士前奖学金计划的支持。作者声明无利益冲突。
不适用。