Müller Anne Dorothee, Gjøde Ida C T, Christensen Sofie H, Jørgensen Sophie K, Fischer Kirstine, Moszkowicz Mala, Hemager Nicoline, Nordentoft Merete, Piché Geneviève, Thorup Anne A E
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Prev Sci. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01831-w.
Selective preventive interventions aim to reduce mental illness in high-risk populations, yet the reasons why some children benefit while others do not remain unclear. This study explores participants' perceptions of mechanisms contributing to change in a family-based preventive intervention for children of parents with severe mental illness. Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods approach, we conducted an abductive qualitative analysis of focus groups (eight parents, eight children) to identify narratives of mechanisms contributing to change. The qualitative findings informed a subgrouping variable for a quantitative post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of secondary data from the VIA Family trial (N = 110). The qualitative findings indicate that child mental health problems, parents' personal unmet needs from childhood, children's relatedness to peers and family, and contextual family-focused activities contribute to change within selective prevention. Quantitative results indicated that parents motivated by a need for support at baseline exhibited meaningful improvements in the home environment upon enrollment in the experimental preventive intervention compared with families motivated to support science (mean change: 5.07, 95% CI 2.11 to 8.03). However, no significant subgroup differences were observed in changes in children's global functioning between the allocation groups. Parents' perceived need for support facilitated engagement and home improvements, while children's relatedness to peers and family contributed to their intervention experiences. These findings emphasize the importance of motivation and social connections in intervention outcomes, contributing to the growing field of precision prevention. Future research should explore these mechanisms as potential mediators or mechanisms of action for selective prevention. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03497663.
选择性预防干预旨在降低高危人群中的精神疾病发生率,但为何有些儿童受益而另一些儿童却没有受益,原因尚不清楚。本研究探讨了参与者对一种针对患有严重精神疾病父母的子女的家庭预防性干预中促成改变的机制的看法。我们采用探索性序列混合方法,对焦点小组(八名父母、八名儿童)进行了溯因定性分析,以确定促成改变的机制的叙述。定性研究结果为对VIA家庭试验(N = 110)的二次数据进行定量事后探索性亚组分析提供了一个亚组划分变量。定性研究结果表明,儿童心理健康问题、父母童年时期未满足的个人需求、儿童与同龄人和家庭的关系以及以家庭为重点的情境活动有助于选择性预防中的改变。定量结果表明,与出于支持科学动机的家庭相比,基线时有支持需求的父母在参加实验性预防干预后,家庭环境有显著改善(平均变化:5.07,95%置信区间2.11至8.03)。然而,在分配组之间,儿童整体功能的变化没有观察到显著的亚组差异。父母感知到的支持需求促进了参与和家庭改善,而儿童与同龄人和家庭的关系影响了他们的干预体验。这些发现强调了动机和社会联系在干预结果中的重要性,为精准预防这一不断发展的领域做出了贡献。未来的研究应探索这些机制作为选择性预防的潜在中介或作用机制。ClinicalTrial.gov标识符:NCT03497663。