• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿片类混合激动剂-拮抗剂与组胺拮抗剂及吗啡的相互作用

Opiate mixed agonist-antagonist interactions with histamine antagonists vs. morphine.

作者信息

Hui F W, Sun C L, Hanig J P

出版信息

Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985 Sep-Oct;7(5):443-7.

PMID:4080063
Abstract

Anecdotal reports of polydrug abuse in humans using tripelennamine and pentazocine prompted our investigation of drug interactions between tripelennamine, morphine and various synthetic mixed agonist-antagonists in mice. Pentazocine, nalbuphene and butorphanol, at doses of 4.0-8.0 mg/kg, all showed frank or borderline intrinsic antinociceptive activity and potentiated the tripelennamine response, whereas cyclazocine, an experimental compound with very strong mixed agonist-antagonist qualities at 5.0 mg/kg, showed intrinsic antinociceptive activity but was not potentiated by tripelennamine and actually blocked the tripelennamine response. In a comparative study, pentazocine, butorphanol and nalbuphene had no effect on morphine antinociception whereas cyclazocine completely abolished the antinociceptive effects of morphine. Cimetidine blocked the response of cyclazocine, but not nalbuphene, pentazocine or butorphanol. Our findings demonstrate that the mechanism of action of cyclazocine is significantly different from that of the other mixed agonist-antagonists studied. They also suggest possible histaminergic involvement in antinociception, as well as a locus for antinociception separate from the opiate receptor.

摘要

关于人类使用曲吡那敏和喷他佐辛后多药滥用的轶事报道促使我们研究曲吡那敏、吗啡与各种合成混合激动剂-拮抗剂在小鼠体内的药物相互作用。喷他佐辛、纳布啡和布托啡诺,剂量为4.0-8.0mg/kg时,均表现出明显或临界的内在抗伤害感受活性,并增强了曲吡那敏的反应,而环唑辛,一种在5.0mg/kg时具有非常强的混合激动剂-拮抗剂特性的实验化合物,表现出内在抗伤害感受活性,但未被曲吡那敏增强,实际上还阻断了曲吡那敏的反应。在一项比较研究中,喷他佐辛、布托啡诺和纳布啡对吗啡的抗伤害感受没有影响,而环唑辛完全消除了吗啡的抗伤害感受作用。西咪替丁阻断了环唑辛的反应,但未阻断纳布啡、喷他佐辛或布托啡诺的反应。我们的研究结果表明,环唑辛的作用机制与所研究的其他混合激动剂-拮抗剂有显著差异。它们还提示组胺能可能参与抗伤害感受,以及存在一个与阿片受体分开的抗伤害感受位点。

相似文献

1
Opiate mixed agonist-antagonist interactions with histamine antagonists vs. morphine.阿片类混合激动剂-拮抗剂与组胺拮抗剂及吗啡的相互作用
Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985 Sep-Oct;7(5):443-7.
2
Potentiation of narcotic-induced antinociception by tripelennamine in morphine-tolerant and drug-naive mice.曲吡那敏对吗啡耐受小鼠和未使用过药物小鼠的麻醉诱导性镇痛作用的增强
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1984 Apr;229(1):214-7.
3
Nalbuphine, pentazocine, and butorphanol interactions with tripelennamine in mice.
NIDA Res Monogr. 1986;67:145-6.
4
Determination and characterization of the antinociceptive activity of intraventricularly administered acetylcholine in mice.脑室内注射乙酰胆碱对小鼠的镇痛活性测定及特性研究
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Jun;193(3):845-52.
5
The new mixed agonist-antagonist analgesics, nalbuphine and butorphanol, vs. pentazocine: relapse and substitution in morphine-addict rats.新型混合激动剂-拮抗剂镇痛药纳布啡和布托啡诺与喷他佐辛的比较:吗啡成瘾大鼠的复发与替代
NIDA Res Monogr. 1981 Feb;34:138-44.
6
Behavioral and morphine-antagonist effects of the optical isomers of pentazocine and cyclazocine.喷他佐辛和环佐辛光学异构体的行为及吗啡拮抗作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972 Mar;180(3):269-79.
7
Antihistaminic-opioid combination: effect on locomotor activity in mice.抗组胺药 - 阿片类药物组合:对小鼠运动活动的影响。
Pol J Pharmacol Pharm. 1988 Sep-Oct;40(5):515-23.
8
Opiate receptor pharmacology: mixed agonist/antagonist narcotics.阿片受体药理学:混合激动剂/拮抗剂类麻醉药
Contemp Anesth Pract. 1983;7:27-43.
9
Interactions between an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist and low-efficacy opioid receptor agonists in assays of schedule-controlled responding and thermal nociception.在日程控制反应和热痛觉测定试验中,N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂与低效阿片受体激动剂之间的相互作用。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Sep;318(3):1300-6. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.101683. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
10
Stereospecificity of mixed-action opioid agonist/antagonists in morphine-tolerant squirrel monkeys.
NIDA Res Monogr. 1990;105:375.