Pretegiani Elena, Garces Pilar, Antoniades Chrystalina A, Sobanska Anna, Kovacs Norbert, Ying Sarah H, Gupta Anoopum S, Perlman Susan, Szmulewicz David J, Pane Chiara, Németh Andrea H, Jardim Laura B, Coarelli Giulia, Kuzmiak Michaela, Milovanovic Andona, Traschütz Andreas, Tarnutzer Alexander A
Unit of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudoise Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Cerebellum. 2025 Aug 13;24(5):141. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01894-z.
Oculomotor deficits are common in hereditary cerebellar ataxias (HCAs) and their quantitative assessment offers a sensitive and reliable manner to capture disease-severity and progression. As a group of experts of the Ataxia Global Initiative to support trial readiness, we previously established harmonized methodology for quantitative oculomotor assessments in HCAs. Here, we aimed to identify to most promising oculomotor/vestibular outcomes as endpoints for future trials. Through a systematic MEDLINE search we identified 130 articles reporting oculomotor/vestibular recordings in patients with HCAs. A total of 2,018 subjects were included: 1,776 with genetically-confirmed and 242 with clinically-defined HCAs. Studied diseases included spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA) 1/2/3/6/7/27B, episodic ataxia type 2, Friedreich ataxia, RFC1-related ataxia, fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, ataxia-telangiectasia, ataxia with oculomotor apraxia types 1&2, and Niemann-Pick disease type C. We identified up to four oculomotor/vestibular outcomes per diagnostic entity, based on their ability to robustly discriminate patients from controls, correlate with disease-severity, detect longitudinal change, and represent different disease stages. For each parameter we provide recommendations for recordings. While the implementation of quantitative assessments into clinical trials offers a unique opportunity to track dysfunction of oculomotor/vestibular networks and to assess the impact of interventions, in some HCAs, endpoint qualification of available outcomes requires further validation to characterize their reliability, sensitivity to change, and minimally important change to patients. For all HCAs for which quantitative data are scarce or lacking, there is an urgent need for prospective studies covering a broader range of oculomotor/vestibular domains as approaching new treatments require harmonized and reliable endpoints.
动眼神经功能障碍在遗传性小脑共济失调(HCA)中很常见,对其进行定量评估为了解疾病严重程度和进展提供了一种敏感且可靠的方法。作为支持试验准备的全球共济失调倡议组织的一组专家,我们之前已建立了用于HCA定量动眼神经评估的统一方法。在此,我们旨在确定最有前景的动眼神经/前庭结果作为未来试验的终点。通过系统检索MEDLINE,我们识别出130篇报告HCA患者动眼神经/前庭记录的文章。总共纳入了2018名受试者:1776名基因确诊的和242名临床确诊的HCA患者。所研究的疾病包括脊髓小脑共济失调(SCA)1/2/3/6/7/27B型、发作性共济失调2型、弗里德赖希共济失调、RFC1相关共济失调、脆性X相关震颤/共济失调综合征、脑腱性黄瘤病、共济失调毛细血管扩张症、动眼神经失用症1型和2型,以及尼曼-匹克病C型。我们根据每个诊断实体区分患者与对照的能力、与疾病严重程度的相关性、检测纵向变化的能力以及代表不同疾病阶段的能力,确定了每个诊断实体多达四个动眼神经/前庭结果。对于每个参数,我们提供了记录建议。虽然将定量评估纳入临床试验为追踪动眼神经/前庭网络功能障碍以及评估干预效果提供了独特机会,但在某些HCA中,现有结果的终点资格需要进一步验证,以确定其可靠性、对变化的敏感性以及对患者的最小重要变化。对于所有缺乏或缺少定量数据的HCA,迫切需要开展前瞻性研究,涵盖更广泛的动眼神经/前庭领域,因为随着新治疗方法的出现,需要统一且可靠的终点。