Suppr超能文献

穿刺钳辅助腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝的短期疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究

Short-term outcomes of puncturing forceps-assisted laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty for indirect inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Feng Jing, Dong Boye, Ren Baojun, Geng Yan

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde), No. 1 Jiazi Road, Lunjiao, Shunde District, Foshan City, 528308, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02363-2.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of using puncturing forceps in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP), with a comparative analysis against conventional TEP utilizing standard surgical instruments. 44 male patients with primary indirect inguinal hernia were included, 22 received conventional TEP (CTEP) and the other 22 accepted TEP performed with lightweighted instruments (LTEP). Demographic variables, primary outcomes (operative time, operative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay) and short-term outcomes (recurrence, readmission and reoperation within 30 days) were collected and analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference between the LTEP group and the CTEP group in terms of age, BMI, location of indirect inguinal hernia, and ASA score. The mean operative time of LTEP group was 8.77 mins shorter, but the difference was insignificant (60.32 mins vs. 69.09 mins, P = 0.099). A total of thirteen patients suffered peritoneal punching (5 in LTEP group, 8 in CTEP group). There was no seroma and no injury of the inferior epigastric vessel and vas deferens. Postoperative hospital stays, reoperation, readmission and recurrence were similar during follow-up. LTEP has comparable short-term outcomes to CTEP and the feasibility and safety is confirmed.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)中使用穿刺钳的可行性和安全性,并与使用标准手术器械的传统TEP进行对比分析。纳入44例男性原发性腹股沟斜疝患者,22例接受传统TEP(CTEP),另外22例接受使用轻型器械的TEP(LTEP)。收集并分析人口统计学变量、主要结局指标(手术时间、手术并发症及术后住院时间)和短期结局指标(30天内复发、再次入院及再次手术情况)。LTEP组与CTEP组在年龄、体重指数、腹股沟斜疝位置及美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分方面无统计学显著差异。LTEP组平均手术时间短8.77分钟,但差异无统计学意义(60.32分钟对69.09分钟,P = 0.099)。共有13例患者发生腹膜穿刺(LTEP组5例,CTEP组8例)。未出现血清肿,也未发生腹壁下血管及输精管损伤。随访期间,术后住院时间、再次手术、再次入院及复发情况相似。LTEP与CTEP的短期结局相当,其可行性和安全性得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验