• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介绍Senhance机器人全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术:单中心的初步经验、学习曲线和中期结果。

Introducing Senhance robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty: initial experiences, learning curve, and mid-term outcomes from a single center.

作者信息

Ng Kuan Chong, Huang Shi-Wei, Huang Yu-Wen, Yuan Lun-Hsiang

机构信息

Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin Branch, No.95, Xuefu Rd., Huwei Township, Yunlin, 632, Taiwan (R.O.C.).

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 24;19(1):322. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02500-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02500-4
PMID:40555886
Abstract

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty offers less pain and faster recovery than open repair, but it is technically demanding. The Senhance surgical system integrates eye-tracking, haptic feedback, and reusable instruments; however, robust clinical data in TEP remain limited. Between January 2019 and July 2023, we prospectively enrolled 109 adults who underwent Senhance-assisted TEP (S-TEP) at a single center; 57 retrospective laparoscopic TEP (L-TEP) served as an operative-time benchmark. Patients with prior pelvic-malignancy surgery, ascites, peritoneal dialysis, emergency surgeries, or general anesthesia intolerance were excluded. Patient demographics, hernia type, operative time, 30-day complications, pain scores, length of stay, recurrence, and chronic pain were recorded systematically. We used cumulative-sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve, and compare the operative-time with L-TEP after overlap weighing balance. All S-TEP procedures were completed robotically without conversions or intra-operative complications. CUSUM revealed a three-phase learning curve, reaching proficiency after ≈50 cases as mean operative time fell from 145 ± 32 min to 93 ± 18 min (p < 0.001). Thirty-day morbidity was 6.4%, mainly early seroma or hematoma. At a median 50-month follow-up, recurrence and chronic pain rates were 0.9 and 1.8%, respectively. Weighted analysis showed that operative time in the mature S-TEP phase matched L-TEP. S-TEP is feasible and safe for inguinal hernioplasty, achieving favorable mid-term outcomes comparable to laparoscopic standards after a learning curve of roughly 50 cases. Further validation through larger, multicenter studies are warranted.

摘要

腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术比开放修补术疼痛更少、恢复更快,但技术要求较高。Senhance手术系统集成了眼动追踪、触觉反馈和可重复使用的器械;然而,TEP方面有力的临床数据仍然有限。在2019年1月至2023年7月期间,我们前瞻性地纳入了109例在单一中心接受Senhance辅助TEP(S-TEP)的成年人;57例回顾性腹腔镜TEP(L-TEP)作为手术时间基准。排除既往有盆腔恶性肿瘤手术史、腹水、腹膜透析、急诊手术或不耐受全身麻醉的患者。系统记录患者人口统计学资料、疝类型、手术时间、30天并发症、疼痛评分、住院时间、复发情况和慢性疼痛。我们使用累积和(CUSUM)分析来评估学习曲线,并在重叠加权平衡后将手术时间与L-TEP进行比较。所有S-TEP手术均通过机器人完成,无中转或术中并发症。CUSUM显示出三相学习曲线,在约50例手术后达到熟练水平,平均手术时间从145±32分钟降至93±18分钟(p<0.001)。30天发病率为6.4%,主要是早期血清肿或血肿。在中位50个月的随访中,复发率和慢性疼痛率分别为0.9%和1.8%。加权分析显示,成熟S-TEP阶段的手术时间与L-TEP相当。S-TEP用于腹股沟疝修补术是可行且安全的,在经过约50例的学习曲线后,可取得与腹腔镜标准相当的良好中期结果。有必要通过更大规模的多中心研究进行进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Introducing Senhance robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty: initial experiences, learning curve, and mid-term outcomes from a single center.介绍Senhance机器人全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术:单中心的初步经验、学习曲线和中期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 24;19(1):322. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02500-4.
2
Senhance versus da Vinci robotic inguinal hernia repair: a multi-center propensity-weighted study.Senhance与达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项多中心倾向加权研究。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):174. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03364-1.
3
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜及机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
4
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
5
Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.老年患者开放与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):179. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03368-x.
6
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub2.
8
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的系统评价
Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0309-3. Epub 2005 Feb 10.
9
Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.完全腹膜外(TEP)与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)疝修补术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和试验序贯分析。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02407-7. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
10
Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review.开放或内镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术?一项系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):161-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0167-4. Epub 2006 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 26;19(2):e0298989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298989. eCollection 2024.
2
Laparoscopic versus robotic TAPP/TEP inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter, propensity score weighted study.腹腔镜与机器人经腹腹膜前修补术/完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝:一项多中心、倾向评分加权研究。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02916-7. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis.
森恩希(Senhance)机器人与达芬奇(da Vinci)机器人根治性前列腺切除术的比较:短期疗效、学习曲线和成本分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):116-121. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00717-8. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
5
Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system.退伍军人事务系统中开放、腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝修补术的趋势和结果。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):889-899. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
6
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
7
Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures.常见手术中机器人手术采用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.
8
Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair - a review of the literature.腹股沟疝修补术中复发的手术危险因素——文献综述
Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Apr 13;2(2):53-59. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0013. eCollection 2017 Jun.
9
Robotic surgery using Senhance robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases.使用 Senhance 机器人平台进行机器人手术:100 例单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):371-376. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01000-6. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
10
Senhance robotic platform for gynecologic surgery: a review of literature.用于妇科手术的 Senhance 机器人平台:文献综述。
Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-00620-1. Epub 2019 Jan 18.