Bokma Anniek, Matic Maja, Ralf Arwin, van den Bosch Bianca J C, Kayser Manfred, van Schaik Ron H N, Lafeber Melvin, Coenen Marieke J H, Atrafi Florence
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug;18(8):e70303. doi: 10.1111/cts.70303.
In patients receiving allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) complete chimerism is desired. However, this brings a challenge when non-invasive assessment of recipient germline DNA is required for genetic testing. Here, we aim to create awareness for (pharmaco)genetic sampling in patients following aHSCT based on a case report of a patient following aHSCT in which pharmacogenetic analysis was performed. Six pharmacogenetic genes were analyzed in DNA extracted from peripheral blood (pre- and post-transplant), buccal swab, and hair follicles. To investigate the presence of donor DNA in post-transplant samples, short tandem repeat and digital droplet PCR analysis were performed. DNA from post-transplantation peripheral blood and the buccal swab showed identical genotypes: CYP2C9*1/1, CYP2C191/2, CYP2D62/9, CYP3A41/1, VKORC1-1639TT, SLCO1B11/*5. Pre-transplant DNA showed different genotypes for CYP2D6 (*1/*2) and SLCO1B1 (*1/*1). Due to the low DNA amount extracted from hair follicles, only CYP2D6 and SLCO1B1 were examined, showing identical genotypes to pre-transplantation DNA. Short tandem repeat analysis showed that the buccal swab contained DNA from both donor and recipient. It was estimated that the buccal swab contained ~63% donor DNA, while DNA from hair follicles showed 0% donor DNA. In conclusion, pharmacogenetic profiling after allogenic HSCT should be done with consideration. Analysis of pre-transplant peripheral blood is preferred over buccal swab due to the presence of donor DNA contamination. DNA extracted from hair is also a reliable source; however, application might be restricted due to limited DNA yield.
在接受异基因造血干细胞移植(aHSCT)的患者中,希望实现完全嵌合。然而,当基因检测需要对受者种系DNA进行非侵入性评估时,这带来了一项挑战。在此,我们旨在基于1例接受aHSCT后进行药物遗传学分析的患者病例报告,提高对aHSCT后患者(药物)基因采样的认识。对从外周血(移植前和移植后)、口腔拭子和毛囊中提取的DNA分析了6个药物遗传学基因。为了研究移植后样本中供体DNA的存在情况,进行了短串联重复序列和数字液滴PCR分析。移植后外周血和口腔拭子的DNA显示出相同的基因型:CYP2C9*1/1、CYP2C191/2、CYP2D62/9、CYP3A41/1、VKORC1-1639TT、SLCO1B11/*5。移植前DNA显示CYP2D6(*1/*2)和SLCO1B1(*1/*1)的基因型不同。由于从毛囊中提取的DNA量较低,仅检测了CYP2D6和SLCO1B1,显示出与移植前DNA相同的基因型。短串联重复序列分析表明,口腔拭子中含有供体和受者的DNA。据估计,口腔拭子中含有约63%的供体DNA,而毛囊中的DNA显示供体DNA为0%。总之,异基因HSCT后的药物遗传学分析应谨慎进行。由于存在供体DNA污染,移植前外周血分析优于口腔拭子。从毛发中提取的DNA也是一个可靠的来源;然而,由于DNA产量有限,其应用可能会受到限制。