Jiao Xiaofei, Liu Jiahao, Wu Yijie, Zhong Qing, Zhu Li, Wang Linghui, Li Huayi, Xiang Minghua, Zhao Xuejiao, Zhao Guangnian, Mills Gordon B, Ma Ding, Gao Qinglei, Fang Yong
Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Sci Transl Med. 2025 Aug 13;17(811):eadu6989. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adu6989.
The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.
DNA损伤反应抑制剂(DDRis)所展现出的抗肿瘤活性,部分可归因于其增强免疫反应的能力。然而,DDRis对淋巴细胞具有毒性,特别是当DDRi与其他靶向细胞周期检查点激酶的治疗方法联合使用时,这表明需要制定不同的DDRi治疗方案。在此,我们系统评估了在卵巢癌的不同治疗时间线中,DDRis对肿瘤免疫微环境(TIME)的影响。通过单细胞分析,我们发现,与单一疗法和联合疗法相比,先用聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)进行序贯治疗,随后使用细胞周期检查点激酶WEE1抑制剂(WEE1i),在体内能更有效地根除癌症并产生更强的抗肿瘤免疫反应。序贯治疗和联合治疗方案均可诱导癌细胞发生致命的DNA损伤并激活cGAS-STING通路,但序贯治疗下T细胞的存活率更高。蛋白质组学分析表明,与癌细胞相比,DDRi治疗后T细胞能更快地从DNA损伤中恢复。在同基因高级别浆液性卵巢癌小鼠模型和治疗耐药的卵巢癌患者来源异种移植模型中,与单一疗法相比,免疫检查点疗法和嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR T细胞)与序贯治疗联合使用时效果更佳。我们的研究表明,PARPi和WEE1i序贯治疗可使T细胞免受严重DNA损伤,并激活癌细胞中的cGAS-STING通路,这表明通过改变治疗方案可以优化抗肿瘤免疫和肿瘤生长控制。