Lim David Yurui, Hur Saebeom, Kwon Lyo Min, Itkin Maxim
Department of Radiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.008.
To evaluate whether mesenteric lymphangiography (mLAG) is technically feasible and clinically useful for patients with refractory chylous ascites, chylothorax, and protein-losing enteropathy (PLE).
A retrospective study of 35 patients (male, 16; female, 19; mean age, 56 years; range, 20-78 years) who underwent mLAG at 2 institutions between March 2016 and July 2022 was performed. mLAG was performed via intraoperative and/or percutaneous approaches. Imaging findings were categorized into 3 types: Type 0 (technical failure), Type 1 (limited to mesentery), or Type 2 (central propagation). Auxiliary findings including lymphangiectasia, reflux, and leakage were recorded. Interventions included mesenteric lymph node embolization (mLNE), retroperitoneal lymph node embolization, lymphoplasty, and lymphovenous shunt creation.
Among 35 patients, 27 presented with refractory chylous ascites and/or chylothorax and 8 with PLE. Of the 35 patients, mLAG was performed percutaneously in 21 (60%) patients, intraoperatively in 9 (26%), and both percutaneously and intraoperatively in 5 (14%) patients. The findings were classified as Type 0 in 4 (11%), Type 1 in 8 (23%), and Type 2 in 23 (66%). Of 35 patients, the auxiliary findings of lymphangiectasia (E), reflux (R), and leakage (L) were observed in 20% (n = 7), 23% (n = 8), and 6% (n = 2), respectively. mLNE was performed in 14 patients. Clinical improvement was achieved in 57% (20 of 35) of the patients. One patient developed bowel wall edema post-mLNE; no other severe adverse event was reported.
mLAG is technically feasible and safe. It can be a useful tool to image the mesenteric lymphatics or perform mesenteric lymphatic embolization.
评估肠系膜淋巴管造影(mLAG)对于难治性乳糜性腹水、乳糜胸和蛋白丢失性肠病(PLE)患者在技术上是否可行以及临床上是否有用。
对2016年3月至2022年7月期间在两家机构接受mLAG的35例患者(男性16例,女性19例;平均年龄56岁;范围20 - 78岁)进行回顾性研究。mLAG通过术中及/或经皮途径进行。影像学表现分为3种类型:0型(技术失败)、1型(局限于肠系膜)或2型(向中央扩展)。记录包括淋巴管扩张、反流和渗漏等辅助表现。干预措施包括肠系膜淋巴结栓塞(mLNE)、腹膜后淋巴结栓塞、淋巴管成形术和淋巴静脉分流术。
35例患者中,27例表现为难治性乳糜性腹水和/或乳糜胸,8例表现为PLE。35例患者中,21例(60%)经皮进行mLAG,9例(26%)在术中进行,5例(14%)同时经皮和术中进行。检查结果分类为:0型4例(11%),1型8例(23%),2型23例(66%)。35例患者中,分别有20%(n = 7)、23%(n = 8)和6%(n = 2)观察到淋巴管扩张(E)、反流(R)和渗漏(L)等辅助表现。14例患者进行了mLNE。57%(35例中的20例)的患者临床症状得到改善。1例患者在mLNE后出现肠壁水肿;未报告其他严重不良事件。
mLAG在技术上是可行且安全的。它可以成为一种用于肠系膜淋巴管成像或进行肠系膜淋巴栓塞的有用工具。