Quality assurance of the inter-spot beam delivery of a dose driven continuous scanning proton therapy system.

BACKGROUND

Dose-driven continuous scanning (DDCS) is a type of beam delivery in Hitachi pencil beam scanning (PBS) particle therapy system. Particle beam is irradiated continuously between spots to achieve a higher effective dose rate and a shorter beam delivery time. The beam is only turned off at break spots, the end of a treatment layer and during spill change. The break spot is a unique feature of the DDCS introduced by the treatment planning system (TPS) to interrupt continuous scanning. DDCS separates the dose delivery of a spot into a move dose and stop dose components. The move dose is controlled by the scanning speed and beam current, while the stop dose delivers the remaining monitor units (MUs). Hence, rigorous quality assurance (QA) of the scanning speed and functionality of break spot are required to ensure safe and successful DDCS delivery.

PURPOSE

We aim to report for the first time the QA methodology and result for DDCS, focusing on the scanning speed and break spot validation.

METHODS

A rectangular spiral irradiation pattern with different degree of break spots were irradiated on a 2D strip ionization chamber (CROSSmini) detector using 50  time resolution to validate the break spots. Four methods of measuring scanning speeds were proposed. Using a spiral irradiation pattern, methods one and two applied linear regression to the scanning time measured by the CROSSmini for different inter-spot distances, with measurements taken at sampling rates of 5 and 20 kHz, respectively. Methods three and four measured the scanning time of single inter-spot distances in the X and Y directions. Method three measured the scanning time with the CROSSmini while method four measured the rise and fall time of the scanning magnet (SCM) current. All measurements were performed with 70.2, 150.2 and 228.7 MeV proton beam energies and three different beam currents of 8, 14 and 20 MU/s. Lastly, the scanning speed tolerance limit was calculated analytically under the requirement of avoiding a beam abort when the stop dose was less than zero.

RESULTS

The data recorded by the CROSSmini under the spiral irradiation patterns with break spots was reconstructed into a 2D dose, and the break spots' operations were visually validated for all the energies and beam currents. There were no statistically significant difference in the measured X and Y scanning speeds across the four methods. However, the last method involving the SCM current yielded the largest type A uncertainty of up to 25% ( ) due to the noisy signal. The first method with the linear regression and 5 kHz acquisition rate was preferred due to a smaller type A uncertainty of up to 2.0% and a lower false negative rate in detecting the rising and falling edges during scanning. The calculated tolerance limit based on our current DDCS setting was found to be 0.50 times of the expected scanning speed.

CONCLUSION

We have introduced QA protocols for DDCS, designed to ensure complete and safe beam delivery without interruptions caused by move doses exceeding planned spot doses.