Kanki Akihiko, Fukukura Yoshihiko, Sotozono Hidemitsu, Maeba Kiyoka, Higaki Atsushi, Sato Yuki, Yamamoto Akira, Moriwake Ryo, Tamada Tsutomu
Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki City 701-0192, Okayama, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 22;15(15):1845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151845.
The aim of this study was to determine whether extracellular volume (ECV) fraction as determined by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) can help distinguish between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Participants comprised 101 patients, including 20 diagnosed with AIP (AIP group), 42 with histologically confirmed PDAC (PDAC group), and 39 without pancreatic disease (healthy group). Contrast enhancement (CE) was calculated as CT attenuation in Hounsfield units [HU] on equilibrium-phase CECT-CT attenuation on pre-contrast CT. The ECV fraction was calculated by measuring the region of interest within the pancreatic region and aorta on pre-contrast and equilibrium-phase CECT. CT measurements were compared among groups. CE and ECV fractions were also compared for diffuse ( = 12) and focal or segmental types ( = 8). Focal- or segmental-type AIP was defined as the involvement of one or two pancreas segments. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. CE and ECV fractions differed significantly between the groups ( < 0.001 each). CE was significantly higher in the AIP group (56.8 ± 7.9 HU) than in the PDAC group (42.3 ± 17.0 HU, < 0.001) or healthy group (32.2 ± 6.1 HU, < 0.001). ECV fraction was significantly higher in the AIP group (47.2 ± 7.3%) than in the PDAC group (31.7 ± 12.0%, < 0.001) or healthy group (27.5 ± 5.4%, < 0.001). In the AIP group, no significant differences in CE (56.7 ± 8.2 HU vs. 56.9 ± 8.1 HU; = 1.000) or ECV fraction (48.0 ± 5.6% vs. 46.6 ± 8.4%; = 0.970) were seen between diffuse and focal or segmental types. Areas under the ROC curve for differentiating AIP from PDAC were 0.78 for CE and 0.86 for ECV fraction, showing no significant difference ( = 0.083). ECV fraction might be clinically useful in differentiating AIP from PDAC.
本研究的目的是确定通过对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)测定的细胞外容积(ECV)分数是否有助于区分自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)和胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)。研究对象包括101例患者,其中20例被诊断为AIP(AIP组),42例经组织学证实为PDAC(PDAC组),39例无胰腺疾病(健康组)。对比增强(CE)计算为平衡期CECT上的CT衰减(以亨氏单位[HU]表示)减去对比剂前CT上的CT衰减。ECV分数通过在对比剂前和平衡期CECT上测量胰腺区域和主动脉内的感兴趣区域来计算。对各组的CT测量值进行比较。还对弥漫型(n = 12)和局灶型或节段型(n = 8)的CE和ECV分数进行了比较。局灶型或节段型AIP定义为一个或两个胰腺节段受累。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断效能。各组之间的CE和ECV分数差异显著(均P < 0.001)。AIP组的CE(56.8±7.9 HU)显著高于PDAC组(42.3±17.0 HU,P < 0.001)或健康组(32.2±6.1 HU,P < 0.001)。AIP组的ECV分数(47.2±7.3%)显著高于PDAC组(31.7±12.0%,P < 0.001)或健康组(27.5±5.4%,P < 0.001)。在AIP组中,弥漫型和局灶型或节段型之间的CE(56.7±8.2 HU对56.9±8.1 HU;P = 1.000)或ECV分数(48.0±5.6%对46.6±8.4%;P = 0.970)无显著差异。区分AIP和PDAC的ROC曲线下面积,CE为0.78,ECV分数为0.86,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.083)。ECV分数在临床上可能有助于区分AIP和PDAC。