Niche Overlap in Forest Tree Species Precludes a Positive Diversity-Productivity Relationship.

Niche complementarity is suggested to be a main driver of productivity overyielding in diverse environments due to enhanced resource use efficiency and reduced competition. Here, we combined multiple different approaches to demonstrate that niche overlap is the most likely cause to explain a lack of overyielding of three tree species when grown in different species combinations. First, in an experimental planting we found no relationship between productivity and species diversity for leaf, wood, or root production (no slope was significantly different from zero), suggesting a lack of niche differences among species. Second, data extracted from the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Inventory and Analysis revealed that the species do not significantly co-occur in natural stands ( = 0.4065) as would be expected if coexistence was common across their entire range. Third, we compared trait differences among our species and found that they are not significantly different in multi-dimensional trait space ( = 0.1724). By combining multiple analytical approaches, we provide evidence of potential niche overlap that precludes coexistence and a positive diversity-productivity relationship between these three tree species.