Karamasis Grigoris V, Kourek Christos, Alexopoulos Dimitrios, Parissis John
Cardiology Department, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Rimini 1, Chaidari, 12462 Athens, Greece.
7th Department of Cardiology, Hygeia Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5398. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155398.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents a critical and high-risk scenario with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), initially reserved for inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates, is increasingly being considered in patients with CS due to improvements in device technology, operator experience, and supportive care. This review synthesizes current evidence from large registries, observational studies, and meta-analyses that support the feasibility, safety, and potential survival benefit of urgent or emergent TAVI in selected CS patients. Procedural success is high, and early intervention appears to confer improved short-term and mid-term outcomes compared to balloon aortic valvuloplasty or medical therapy alone. Critical factors influencing prognosis include lactate levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and timing of intervention. The absence of formal guidelines, logistical constraints, and ethical concerns complicate decision-making in this unstable population. A multidisciplinary Heart Team/Shock Team approach is essential to identify appropriate candidates, manage procedural risk, and guide post-intervention care. Further studies and the development of TAVI-specific risk models in CS are anticipated to refine patient selection and therapeutic strategies. TAVI may represent a transformative option for stabilizing hemodynamics and improving outcomes in this otherwise high-mortality group.
重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)背景下的心源性休克(CS)是一种危急且高风险的情况,治疗选择有限且预后不良。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)最初仅用于无法进行手术或手术风险高的患者,由于设备技术、术者经验和支持治疗的改善,越来越多地被考虑用于CS患者。本综述综合了大型注册研究、观察性研究和荟萃分析的现有证据,这些证据支持在选定的CS患者中进行紧急或急诊TAVI的可行性、安全性和潜在生存获益。手术成功率很高,与单纯球囊主动脉瓣成形术或药物治疗相比,早期干预似乎能改善短期和中期结局。影响预后的关键因素包括乳酸水平、左心室射血分数、肾功能和干预时机。缺乏正式指南、后勤限制和伦理问题使这一不稳定人群的决策变得复杂。多学科心脏团队/休克团队方法对于确定合适的候选人、管理手术风险和指导干预后护理至关重要。预计进一步的研究以及CS中TAVI特异性风险模型的开发将完善患者选择和治疗策略。TAVI可能是稳定血流动力学和改善这一高死亡率群体结局的变革性选择。